Binary by Accident Archives
Thursday, February 28, 2002
Wednesday, February 27, 2002
Yes, I am a Jew, from Meryl Yourish, is well worth a read and consideration. I don't feel capable of making the editorial decision of including a quote - better just to read the whole thing.
11:05:21 PMThat's like my favourite - "87% of statistics are made up on the spot"
victor echo zulu
Burningbird stopped by last night and joined the discussion Dane and I have been having about grammar and style in blogging.
I don't disagree that the thought is more important than the medium (which, to me, also means the mechanism of communication).
But, the impact of the thought can definitely be harmed by poor presentation. Great grammar doesn't save a piece of drivel. An excellent piece will not be ruined by the occasional mistake.
I'm not a "real" writer. I won't be published in the traditional media. So, I have to treat my blog with the same degree of care that authors, like Burningbird, need to have in their professional work.
6:34:48 AMTuesday, February 26, 2002
Dear Miss Manners, Is there a blogging etiquette? Sincerely, BS
I only wish it were that easy. Now, with comments being part of Radio, there are even more questions about proper etiquette. (Is there any such thing as improper etiquette?)
When you add a comment to my post, how should I respond? Do I add a new entry to the blog, add a follow-up comment, or privately email you? A combination? Something else?
My initial reaction is to both email the response and also add the message as a comment. That does three things:
- It lets you know that I value and appreciate your participation.
- We can continue the discussion.
- I'm not forced to assume that you'll a)come back and b)search to see my response.
From the "Do As I Say, Not As I Do Department:"
Yesterday's bit about spelling and grammar contained two errors, which I have subsequently fixed. One word didn't mean what I thought it did (doh!). I also smushed (technical term) two words together, giving what I wrote a completely different meaning.
I find things like that all the time in what I write. Blogging does encourage a shortening of the edit process and errors like that creep through. I will fix them as I find them. I like the idea of <edit></edit>, but will only use that if I substantially change or add to a post.
6:25:07 AMMonday, February 25, 2002
"People expect email to be prompt, funny and not spellchecked. They expect the same from your weblog." (Courtesy: Dane Carlson)
I'm not so sure. If an email has a typo, fine - that happens. But, when something is being posted for all to see, I want it to be "right". When sharing your thoughts, ideas, and opinions, your spelling and grammar are the only things that can be "right". The rest is subjective.
Personally, I don't want people to see my careless mistakes. Every day at work, I see professionals with good educations misusing here, hear, their, they're, too, to, and two. Subject-verb agreement is often optional (We was...). To me, it's like fingernails on a chalkboard.
I don't actually use a spellchecker on these posts. I often regret it. I make frequent revisions of posts just to fix spelling errors. It's important to me. Many of you reading this will never have other contact with me other than through writing. The impression you get of me (and, honestly, my impression of you) will be formed by my ability to communicate through this medium - spelling and grammar are a large part of that. If we interacted in other settings, your impression of me would be influenced by many other factors. But we don't and likely won't.
You can be darn sure I ran this particular post through a checker. The spelling is "right" - your mileage may vary on the opinion.
And I have always come down on the side of the spelling COUNTS! people.
I are a English major.
:-)
Meryl Yourish
Bill,
I don't mean to imply that you should leave spelling, grammar and style out of your posts; just that your readers, on a whole, will not object to finding a occasional misspelled word.
Online, you are what you write. If I want to make a quick post, I'm not going to drop it into Word for a spell and grammar check, I'm going to post (and fix it later, if necessary.)
That's just me.
Dane.
Dane Carlson
Dane - your original post was just the catalyst for putting pen to paper, er...fingers to keyboard. It provided the opportunity to rant. Seeing too many misspellings of lose/loose in one day will do that to a guy. I wasn't implying that your posts are sloppy - quite the contrary. Too many people, again IMO, though, are happy with typing something up quickly, hitting post (or whatever mechanism they use to publish) and moving on. If somebody wants me to care about what they write, it helps if they show they care. And a big part of showing that care is proper spelling and grammar. That being said, I thought I was careful in writing my post - unfortunately, even after 2 fixes, I see things I would like to change. I probably won't because it's moved into style preference instead of correctness. Sometimes, it is too easy to post! Maybe your original post was right on and I'm the exception that proves the rule! Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Bill
Bill Simoni
I have never hidden the fact that both my grammar and spelling at my weblog can be "creative". This is usually the result of writing from passion and interest and sometimes not being that concerned about the mechanics.
Perhaps we should all focus on the thought rather than the medium.
Burningbird
I'm pitching my tent in Bill's camp on this one.
I'm definitely anal when it comes to spelling and grammar - especially spelling. With grammar, I often get creative - a writer's prerogative - but I know the rules, I just break them on purpose. <g>
I do see a difference though. If I'm dashing off a brief e-mail to a friend, I won't spell check it, but I do try to be careful. I find myself being much more careful about spelling and grammar when I'm writing something serious. (or when I'm writing about spelling and grammar - this has been spell checked <g>) If I want those reading what I write to take me seriously, I must take the writing seriously as well.
So many misunderstandings come about because the writer did not take the time to chose the right words, and then put them in the right order. But then, I'm one of those people who is fascinated by the nuances of difference between words. I keep my Webster's, Roget's and my Super Thesaurus close at hand always. I keep this quote - "Language is the apparel in which your thoughts parade in public. Never clothe them in vulgar and shoddy attire." (Dr. George W. Crane) - handy as well
When I cringe over an error or critique someone's writing, I do make allowances for the age, and primary language of the writer. That's only fair.
Kath
Bill, try again. I just clicked on your validation link and it worked. UserLand may have overwritten your patches, but I think they fixed the problem.
Jeff Cheney
This is weird. I checked my page and found that it wasn't validating so I did some digging and found that UserLand has not patched radio.html.commentLink to escape the ampersand in the comments url. So why is it working on your site? Did you patch it again?
Jeff Cheney
I did go in and re-do the ampersands. It's a quick fix and I'll just have to do it each time the particular built-in macro changes or it gets "fixed".
Bill Simoni
Sunday, February 24, 2002
You're most welcome, Bill!
Jeff Cheney
Saturday, February 23, 2002
Well, I finally have valid CSS.
Unfortunately, I cannot get the HTML to validate. Part of the validator results make no sense to me. It says some tags aren't closed, which I don't see when I look through the source. Other errors are caused by the comments feature - but those concern me much less.
I am, once again, frustrated.
- You need to add a meta tag declaring your document's character encoding, e.g.
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
- You need to encode the ampersands in your urls, e.g. instead of
http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=100111&c=counts
you should use
http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=100111&amp;c=counts
As for the unbalanced tags, I would suspect that you've wrapped the <%items%> in your #dayTemplate with paragraph tags, which is fine as long as the items don't contain any block-level tags.
Jeff Cheney
This is a test to see when the comment count gets updated. I'm not sure whether it updates real-time or only when the page is published.
Bill Simoni
Follow-up. All you have to do is refresh the page and you'll see the updated comment count. Excellent!
Bill Simoni
Friday, February 22, 2002
Can't wait until next month! My luck's gotta change, right?
11:33:39 PMThursday, February 21, 2002
I'll take my ball and go home
Alright, I've officially become disgusted by the Olympics - the Russians are upset and threatening to pull out, and the South Koreans have hired lawyers and are threatening to sue the short-track race official for disqualifying their athlete (Disqualifications for on-ice events are quite common in short-track). This is not what the Olympics are supposed to be.
Unfortunately, all of this started with the pairs figure skating controversy. Now, athletes that don't take home a gold medal feel the need to have the decision overturned administratively.
Bah - let the Russians and Koreans go home. The Olympics should be a competition with honor, humility, and pride in your accomplishments (no matter whether or not they garner you a medal).
While we're at it, send the professional athletes home as well.
10:03:58 PMEverything appears to work great!
Bill Simoni
I'm sure the number two request involves a connection between the comments and the Spam-Free Mailto so that the weblog owner will be notified when a comment is added.
Dane Carlson
Wednesday, February 20, 2002
John Walkenbach's The Spreadsheet Page quietly celebrated its 6th birthday a few days ago. John provides an excellent resource for intermediate and advanced usage of Excel. He also is the top author of Excel-related books, covering everything from the Dummies series to Power Programming.
Happy Birthday!
6:35:09 AMTuesday, February 19, 2002
Monday, February 18, 2002
Sunday, February 17, 2002
If you've been here before you'll notice things look a little different. Binary by Accident is now CSS-based. I don't quite have the HTML and CSS validating yet, but I've got the look. It should look passable in CSS-capable modern browser (Mozilla, Opera, N6, and IE), while it degrades gracefully for the NN4 users out there. I don't have testing capabilities for Mac browsers, so if something is horribly broken, let me know via
.
Be forewarned - lots of tweaking shall be going on.
8:19:07 PMSaturday, February 16, 2002
Australia's Steven Bradbury just became the first Australian to ever win a gold medal in the Winter Olympics. He won the 1,000 meter short-track speed skating finals by positioning himself perfectly. On the last turn, the other 4 competitors, including alleged US Olympic Trial race-fixer Apolo Anton Ohno, jostled each other and fell. Bradbury, who trailed the pack, by a good 30 feet, skated unopposed across the finish line.
All through the aftermath of the race and the medal ceremony, Bradbury was beaming. It was a great sight. It turns out he is also recovering from a life-threatening training injury. Things like this are what make me watch and enjoy the Olympics - not watching a bunch of pros play hockey.
Note: CBC Sports Online has better coverage of this than ESPN.
11:30:44 PMFriday, February 15, 2002
Thursday, February 14, 2002
Wednesday, February 13, 2002
Dave asked: Are Tables Really Evil?
I'll bite - caveat: I'm not a web designer or a professional programmer. I play here as a hobby. I enjoy trying to make things work, although I often lack the knowledge to do so.
<rant>Tables vs. CSS is a highly religious subject. As a lay person, here is my summary and thoughts. Per the W3C spec, tables are meant to hold tabular information. Using them for layout was originally a hack, because there was no other mechanism to do so. With CSS, a "proper" (per spec) mechanism for layout was introduced.
What is the use if tables work well? Older browsers (v4 and earlier) often have trouble rendering the complex nestings common in layouts. Lynx has problems with tables. Surfers that use a screen reader are stymied by layout tables. Individually, any of these groups make up quite a minority of web surfers, but this may be important for commercial websites.
As designers learn their craft, they should learn to code to spec. Then, once they have mastered that, they learn when breaking it is the right thing to do. Until this sort of training becomes commonplace, we are going to see lots of sites relying on tables for layout that don't need to.
Now - for the amateur website creator (this is where I put Dave - he doesn't create webpages for a living) this debate is less significant. If Dave doesn't want to learn CSS layout - fine. He does make the distinction that "The way I choose to render SN and the wants of Radio 8 and Manila users are totally separate things." I hope this means that he would consider implementing out-of-the-box CSS layout. Although, I'd want to make sure the flexibility is still there for the developer who wants to tweak things. I doubt that any default CSS template for a Radio weblog would satisfy a majority of users.
</rant>
- If I find and change the code that renders the <%code%> bit, will I be setting myself up to be broken in a Radio update? Goal: Render a border around each day's posts.
- Can I find a way to call the thisMonth macro in a link with parameters? I want to have a link that says "January archives" and have it point to a dynamically generated page (rather than have a page hard-coded).
- I like the idea of reading an external file to render the navlinks on the left. How can I modify how this works to have more control in giving them categories? My hack doesn't allow separate formatting for each category - in fact, they aren't categories, just cleverly (to me at least) lacking a URL to point to, thus not being formatted as links. I've lost a link to a page that talked about doing it with an outline, but even so, I didn't understand it.
Tuesday, February 12, 2002
Monday, February 11, 2002
Sunday, February 10, 2002
This also begs the question - Do any self-respecting Canadians actually drink Bud products? 10:36:17 PM
Saturday, February 09, 2002
On second thought, he could have been asking "Why?" The answer to that is tougher. I find it highly addictive. There is a combination of strategy and execution that intrigues me. Watch it if you get a chance - you may get hooked. 6:03:43 PM
Friday, February 08, 2002
In the meantime, I'm reading the A List Apart, A Season on the Brink, the last few days of css-discuss, and my Form 1040 instructions. 7:43:42 PM
Wednesday, February 06, 2002
Monday, February 04, 2002
Sunday, February 03, 2002
2 of the last 3 Super Bowls have been great - let the Rams come every year if this is the game we'll get from it. 11:07:49 PM
On the menu: a jambalaya recipe I picked up last year from Emeril, some chili, cornbread, caesar salad, spinach dip, and oatmeal cookies. Maureen is probably going to enjoy watching me slave over the two main courses today - she gets to do the sides, but is such a seasoned cooking pro, so never gets fazed, no matter how many things she's cooking at once. 9:59:51 AM
Saturday, February 02, 2002
Friday, February 01, 2002
- it's time to create
Wow! It's been a while since I read anything so powerful on the web. Thanks for the link!
Jeff Cheney