| February 2003 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | |
| Jan Mar | ||||||
Microsoft Bloggers:
Benjamin J. J. Voigt
Better Living Through Software
Console.WriteLine("Hello World");
Denatonium benzoate: Kent Sharkey"s blog
Don Box's Spoutlet
Harry Pierson's DevHawk Weblog
Incessant Ramblings
InkBlog : The Random Musings of David Weller
jimmygrewal.com
Joe Beda's EightyPercent.Net
John Lambert
Karsten Januszewski's UDDI Web Log
meta-douglasp
michaelw.net
min jeschwad
Objective
Peter Drayton's Radio Weblog
Pushing the Envelope
Rob Fahrni, at the core.
ScottGu's Blog
Tantek Çelik
Technovangelist (Matt Williams) WebLog
Y. B. NormalIt doesn't work for all NATs, but most and this mechanism does not use UPnP.
Not all NATs are created equal. The differences between them depend on thier behavior when an outgoing connection occurs, the most strict form of NAT (symetrical) requires that whatever port+IP you connected to is the only allow to send packets back in. This is one of the more "secure" forms of NATs (although NATs don't really exist to provide security). A lesser form might say that any port from the destination ip address is allowed to send packets back. Another type is the a NAT (Full Cone) that once a connection is established out anyone anywhere can send a packet back in. Different applications tend to fail or have some serious performance degragation (because it has to go through a less scalable central server) with a symetric NAT. Simular to symetric NATs (but will actually work when bootstrapping with an outside server) is the restricted NAT. I've wrote a little about the difference here.
10:11:11 AM
comments ==
My external is only 40 Gigs, and it's not even three months old yet. I just hope that the longhorn deisgners pay cloe attention to this trend.. Huge portable harddrives are going to be everywhere.
12:59:41 AM
12:40:26 AM