<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:26:00 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>&lt;i&gt;Patrick Beard&lt;/i&gt;</title>		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/</link>		<description>&lt;i&gt;It&apos;s like the wild west, and everybody is sheriff... - r.v.&lt;/i&gt;</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2003 Patrick Beard</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:26:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>		<managingEditor>pcbeard@mac.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>pcbeard@mac.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>23</hour>			<hour>0</hour>			<hour>1</hour>			<hour>2</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>8</hour>			</skipHours>		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<description>&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.jnidirect.org&quot;&gt;JNIDirect&lt;/A&gt; is released! The code is checked in to &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/projects/jnidirect/&quot;&gt;Source Forge&lt;/A&gt; and there is a &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.jnidirect.org/WhitePaper.txt&quot;&gt;white paper&lt;/A&gt; describing what it&apos;s all about.Using native methods w/o JNIDirect is like debugging with stone tools...</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/03/17.html#a69</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:25:59 GMT</pubDate>			<category>Technical</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=69&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2003%2F03%2F17.html%23a69</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>Wow, the IPv6 transition is really a mess. &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/A&gt; describes why it is being bungled. Perhaps they need that networking saviour, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.stuartcheshire.org/&quot;&gt;Stuart Cheshire&lt;/A&gt; to step in and come up with some clever solutions.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/03/11.html#a68</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:22:16 GMT</pubDate>			<category>Technical</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=68&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2003%2F03%2F11.html%23a68</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>This item from &lt;a href=&quot;http://maccentral.macworld.com&quot;&gt;MacCentral&lt;/a&gt; boggles the mind:&lt;a href=&quot;http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0302/19.macbu.php&quot;&gt;Microsoft acquires Virtual PC from Connectix&lt;/a&gt;Here are a couple things Microsoft might do:1. kill the VirtualPC product for the Mac, to lock Mac users out of future versions of this powerful PC emulation engine.2. recompile the Windows bits as PowerPC native code, potentially hugely accelerating the performance.If they chose option 2, then who knows, maybe they&apos;d release PowerPC code generators for their compilers, and things could get weird pretty fast.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/02/19.html#a67</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:20:07 GMT</pubDate>			<category>Technical</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=67&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2003%2F02%2F19.html%23a67</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>OK, I finally get this &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://backend.userland.com/rss&quot;&gt;RSS&lt;/A&gt; stuff. Represent news items as XML, aggregate them in a page. Voila! You have a web log.For a long time I didn&apos;t get it. What would an end user want with all that XML? Well, not much really, it&apos;s only valuable if it&apos;s displayed in a format the user can use. But one never knows what it might become useful for down the road. Makes you think...Being an editor is the most crucial thing. Sure, you get lots of RSS stuff thrown your way, but you sift the good stuff from the chaff, and decide what YOU think is interesting. One thing I&apos;m curious about is attribution. For example, I just posted a &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/02/13.html&quot;&gt;blurb about Apple&lt;/A&gt; which included attribution to MacSlash. Must I do that? Are there rules about this stuff?</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/02/13.html#a63</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:00:34 GMT</pubDate>			<category>Technical</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=63&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2003%2F02%2F13.html%23a63</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>Just saw this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macslash.org&quot;&gt;MacSlash&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macslash.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/13/0236207&quot;&gt;Apple Posts XML Schema For Keynote&lt;/a&gt;Very interesting. Makes Keynote all the more attractive over PowerPoint. Microsoft uses XML file formats too, but they don&apos;t document it, and have so many extensions that it isn&apos;t very useful XML. If Apple stands behind this specification, this is a really good thing (tm).</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2003/02/13.html#a62</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:45:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.macslash.com/macslash.rdf">MacSlash: A daily dose of Macintosh News and Discussion</source>			<category>Technical</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=62&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2003%2F02%2F13.html%23a62</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>I took a flute lesson from Guido Fazio at &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.houseofwoodwinds.com/Instruction/instruction.html&quot;&gt;House of Woodwinds&lt;/A&gt; last week, to get an alternative view on how thisinstrument is supposed to be played. The single most useful thing hetold me about the flute embouchure (how you hold your mouth) is tovisualize yourself sucking on a thin straw. That puts your mouth in the right formation, then you blow with the same mouth position.Since that lesson, I&apos;ve also been experimenting with my saxembouchure, hoping one day to wean myself of my wax &amp; gauzecrutch that I&apos;ve been using for a while to help play withoutfeeling any pain. I managed to do a couple of rehearsals last weekwithout using the crutch, but had performances Friday and Saturdaynight which I absolutely needed to be able to play comfortably.The sax and flute embouchures are similar, except for oneimportant difference:  you need to support the reed without lettingany air leak out of the mouth, but without biting the lower lip withthe bottom teeth. This is the source of my frustration, how tokeep from biting my bottom lip, while supporting the reed enough toget a pleasing sound. Ironically, the sax tone is muchbetter the more you allow the reed to vibrate, but it also feels muchmore out of control.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0102607/2002/12/17.html#a60</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:55:43 GMT</pubDate>			<category>Music</category>			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=102607&amp;amp;p=60&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0102607%2F2002%2F12%2F17.html%23a60</comments>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>