<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.7 on Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:37:39 GMT --><rss version="0.92">	<channel>		<title>New Literacy</title>		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0103684/</link>		<description>Bo Brock&apos;s weblog</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2002 Bo Brock</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:37:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>		<managingEditor>bo@pobox.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>bo@pobox.com</webMaster>		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>		<item>			<description>Don&apos;t let anyone fool you: &quot;Hailstorm Down&quot; is the most important tech story so far this year. A rare victory in a two-front war: &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/11/technology/11NET.html?ex=1019102400&amp;en=db0f34e89b48ed0d&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND&quot;&gt;Microsoft Has Shelved Its Internet &apos;Persona&apos; Service&lt;/a&gt;. Microsoft has quietly shelved a consumer information service that was once planned as the centerpiece of the company&apos;s foray into the market for tightly linked Web services. By John Markoff. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.userland.com/newYorkTimes&quot;&gt;New York Times: Technology&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt;Even laughably inept direct marketers like American Express have limits to the amount of crap they will put their customers through. </description>			<source url="http://radiouser:Csm!]-tvMm@partners.userland.com/nyt/technology.xml">New York Times: Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<description>Of course, I include myself as a member of the &quot;uninformed weblog minions.&quot;</description>			</item>		<item>			<description>I swore I would refrain from &quot;metacommentary,&quot; but this is too  rich to pass up. To my mind, this is the quintessence of useless blogging:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/06/business/media/06BOOK.html?ex=1018674000&amp;en=7ba1337564bf60a5&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND &quot;&gt;NYTimes&lt;/a&gt;: Oprah Winfrey announced that she would no longer host monthly &quot;book clubs&quot; on her television talk show, saying that she could no longer find enough compelling books. &lt;i&gt;A sad statement indeed&lt;/i&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://live.curry.com/&quot;&gt;Adam Curry: Adam Curry&apos;s Weblog&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt;What just happened? A weblogger took an asinine bite from a media star at face value, providing a link to the Times story with token commentary. Where is the value in that?The status of Oprah&apos;s book club is not a proxy for the health of American publishing. Her literary taste aside, there are dozens of books published every year that are &lt;em&gt;good enough to merit discussion on her show&lt;/em&gt;. She is purposely casting a more selective net, for reasons the uninformed weblog minions can only speculate about.</description>			<source url="http://cloud.datashed.net/users/adam@curry.com/curryCom.xml">Adam Curry: Adam Curry&apos;s Weblog</source>			</item>		<item>			<description>Just received my copy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0871141027/ref=ed_oe_p/002-4358058-2218450&quot;&gt;The Atlas of Oregon, 2nd Ed.&lt;/a&gt; I could almost weep at the lyricism of it. Apologies to Nicholson Baker, over there in the hamper.</description>			</item>		<item>			<description>The mere presence of BBEdit Lite on my iMac has convinced me to participate in the design world as a creator instead of the informed bystander I have played for so long. It&apos;s been many years since I coded HTML (in a long-forgotten app called HotDog), and that shows you where I&apos;m starting.Over.</description>			</item>		<item>			<description>To properly compare weblogs with other media, it is necessary to first benchmark what I read elsewhere. To wit:I subscribe to (and regularly read) the following magazines: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wired/current.html&quot;&gt;Wired&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com&quot;&gt;Fast Company&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com&quot;&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com&quot;&gt;The Atlantic Monthly&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utne.com&quot;&gt;Utne Reader&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harpers.org&quot;&gt;Harper&apos;s&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smithsonianmag.com&quot;&gt;Smithsonian&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discover.com&quot;&gt;Discover&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.granta.com&quot;&gt;Granta&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldpress.org&quot;&gt;World Press Review&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu&quot;&gt;Harvard Business Review&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastingcable.com&quot;&gt;Broadcasting &amp; Cable&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com&quot;&gt;Business Week&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.business2.com&quot;&gt;Business 2.0&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com&quot;&gt;Technology Review&lt;/a&gt;.Given this reading list -- which does not include books, newspapers, other websites, mailing lists, reference materials, etc. -- how much time do I have to read weblogs? Not much. What value do they add? I have no way of knowing until I read them. So while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com&quot;&gt;Dave Winer&lt;/a&gt; and other champions of the medium argue for the contextual strength of the weblog community, I still need to invest hundreds of hours in parsing the stuff, just as I did while shaping my magazine list. You still have to &lt;em&gt;read&lt;/em&gt;.What are the chances of weblogs being materially better or more diverse than my publications? I don&apos;t know yet, and the opportunity cost for finding out is huge.</description>			</item>		<item>			<description>Learning to use Mac OS X is a humbling experience, reminding you of all the things you might have become with this kind of tool: programmer, designer, writer, artist. Instead, I got an &lt;a href=&quot;http://gsb.uchicago.edu/&quot;&gt;MBA&lt;/a&gt;. Ummm.</description>			</item>		<item>			<description>The New Yorker has an excellent Malcolm Gladwell review concerning the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?critics/020325crbo_books&quot;&gt;enduring virtues of paper&lt;/a&gt;, where he discusses a few books which are (ostensibly) more scholarly versions of Nicholson Baker&apos;s polemic against a paperless world. I suppose other media will follow paper&apos;s lead and continue to serve the applications for which they are uniquely qualified; perhaps television will yet remain in a more pure state, beyond the grasp of interactivity&apos;s sundry acronyms (&lt;i&gt;pace&lt;/i&gt; TiVo, which is a fundamentally great tool).</description>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>