<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Tue, 15 Mar 2005 03:13:33 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>EPimentl: eGovernment</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/</link>
		<description></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2005 EPimentl</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 03:13:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>ed@edpimentel.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ed@edpimentel.com</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<skipHours>
			<hour>2</hour>
			<hour>3</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>6</hour>
			<hour>12</hour>
			<hour>17</hour>
			<hour>22</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/14.html#a174</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33008-2005Mar14.html?nav=rss_nation/columns/kurtzhoward&quot;&gt;An Opinionated Network&lt;/a&gt;.
In covering the Iraq war last year, 73 percent of the stories on Fox
News included the opinions of the anchors and journalists reporting
them, a new study says. By washingtonpost.com. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/columns/kurtzhoward?nav=rss_nation/columns/kurtzhoward&quot;&gt;washingtonpost.com - Media Notes Extra&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/14.html#a174</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 03:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/columns/kurtzhoward/rssheadlines.xml">washingtonpost.com - Media Notes Extra</source>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>
e-Parliament.</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/03.html#a155</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110120/categories/egovernment/2005/03/03.html#a1605&quot;&gt;e-Parliament&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://k-government.blogspot.com/2005/02/resources-for-your-curiosity.html&quot;&gt;Carlos Guadian&lt;/a&gt; from Spain mentions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-parl.net/&quot;&gt;e-Parliament&lt;/a&gt;,
a new online institution to bring together elected officials from
around the world into a global forum to help build a better world. I am
encouraging some Utah legislators to participate. It looks like an
interesting e-democracy experiment.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110120/categories/egovernment/&quot;&gt;David Fletcher: eGovernment&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/03.html#a155</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:12:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110120/categories/egovernment/rss.xml">David Fletcher: eGovernment</source>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>EGov</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/01.html#a149</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/2005/03/01/public_sector_tech/&quot;&gt;Service levels more important than e-gov deadlines: survey&lt;/a&gt;. Who&apos;da thought it [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/03/01.html#a149</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/tonys/slashdot.rdf">The Register</source>
			</item>
		<item>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/02/28.html#a129</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/02/28/anchorfree/index.php?lsrc=mcrss-0205&quot;&gt;AnchorFree offers free Wi-Fi in 4-block SF area&lt;/a&gt;.
Sunnyvale, Calif.-based AnchorFree on Monday announced the creation of
a free Wi-Fi hot zone in San Francisco&apos;s Marina district, along a
four-block area of Chestnut St. between Fillmore and Scott Streets.
Anyone with a Wi-Fi-capable device, including an Apple computer
equipped with AirPort or AirPort Extreme, can use the service indoors
or outdoors. The company said it launched the service in response to
city mayor Gavin Newsom&apos;s 2004 announcement that &quot;we will not stop
until every San Franciscan has access to free wireless Internet
service.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://maccentral.macworld.com/&quot;&gt;MacCentral News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/02/28.html#a129</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://maccentral.macworld.com/mnn.cgi">MacCentral News</source>
			</item>
		<item>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/02/27.html#a124</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wifinetnews.com/archives/004907.html&quot;&gt;WAPI Whacked&lt;/a&gt;.
Chinese peeved, walked out over procedural move in ISO over WAPI: The
Wireless Authentication and Privacy Infrastructure (WAPI) proprietary
standard that the Chinese government originally intended as a mandatory
element for all domestically sold Wi-Fi gear was made optional and
moved into the ISO standards organization to be approved as an
international protocol. It was fast-tracked for approval initially, but
then through a procedural move placed into a slower track. 802.11i
remains fast tracked and may be approved as an optional security
standard by April. I learned recently that the Chinese object to
802.11i because it includes a 128-bit key length version of AES which
they believe the NSA has the ability to decipher. The corresponding
problem with WAPI is that it is a proprietary protocol controlled by
the government which leads one to believe that it has either a
back-door or a weak known flaw in it that would allow interception.... [&lt;a href=&quot;http://wifinetnews.com/&quot;&gt;Wi-Fi Networking News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0105060/categories/egovernment/2005/02/27.html#a124</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://80211b.weblogger.com/xml/scriptingNews2.xml">Wi-Fi Networking News</source>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
