Iggy's Movie Reviews Weblog
Independent reviews of recently released major motion pictures.
















Subscribe to "Iggy's Movie Reviews Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

MOVIE - THE HULK - Review Rating $$$$ (OUT OF 10)

STARRING - Eric Bana (Bruce Banner/Hulk), Jennifer Connelly (Betty), Nick Nolte (Davd Banner), Sam Elliott (General Ross), Josh Lucas (Talbot) & Paul Kersey (young David Banner).

DIRECTOR - Ang Lee (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Ride with the Devil, Sense and Sensibility)

Based on the Marvel comic book series.

The argument has often been made that the reason comic books resonate with their fans to the degree they do is that, over and above their obvious entertainment value, they actually speak to larger social issues and impart animated morality/life lessons. While this may be partly true, to varying degrees depending on the comic book hero we are talking about, the boundaries of credibility become stretched beyond belief when comic book heroes forget what they are.

The Hulk, unlike the other Marvel Comics to be made into movies (Spiderman, X-Men, & Daredevil), is totally devoid of nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more humour. The Hulk wants to be taken ever so seriously despite the fact there isn't enough spandex in the universe to allow Bruce Banner to remain clothed after each of his transformations.

In seeking to be taken seriously the Hulk has raised the ante in the suspension of disbelief sweepstakes and miserably fails to cover the wager made. Most if not all of the problems originate with the script which, on the basis of the limited dialogue in the movie, appears to have been written on a large napkin. There are extended scenes in the Hulk where little or nothing is said. When the actors do speak they are forced to utter some of the most tired and trite observations possible.

The best example of this is the opening sequence. We are treated to the mad scientist (David Banner) silently experimenting with genetic codes. We know he's a mad scientist because 1) General Ross pounds his fists on Banner's desk and tells him he's done because he's been experimenting on humans 2) Banner then blows up the army base and 3) argues with his wife. I'm sorry, but if you want to be taken seriously and raise the subject of genetic manipulation and its potential consequences, you gotta do better than See Dick and Jane run dialogue.

Choosing to portray the Hulk seriously also requires getting other important details correct. Somehow, the Hulk is chased through the streets of San Fransico, by an entire Army division, without attracting the attention of one news helicopter. Indeed, except for the central characters in the movie, average citizens are apparently oblivious to the angry Un-Jolly Green Giant tearing up the city. This lack of mass hysteria is inexcusable in a film that purports to be a serious examination of its subject matter.

One bright spot in this film is that the special effects look better in the final movie than they did in the previews.

The Hulk, with its lack of humour and inflated sense of self-importance, is an oppressive and lifeless two plus hour film. Even the mostly dialogue free final act, a chase across California, fails to ignite the viewer's imagination or increase their pulse.

Running time - 138 minutes

Alternative Reviews:

Roger Ebert's Review

Daniel C. Kasman Review

Peter Travers / Rolling Stone Review

Rotten Tomatoes Reviews

The Hulk Official Web Site


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 David Schwartz.
Last update: 8/9/03; 11:08:27 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
 

Google