.
After reading the above you'd think I really didn't enjoy House of Sand and Fog. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The performances and the depth of the characters portrayed save this film.
Though the premise is contrived the characters, for the most part, are not. Kingsley perfectly captures the wounded pride of the former Colonel. His character, in almost robotic conformity, responds in a manner consistent with his nature. That may not seem like a big thing but it is. The Colonel, unlike so many other underdeveloped main characters in other films, is fleshed out enough for you to appreciate, if not like, his reactions. The same can be said of Connelly's performance and character too. Typical of her addictive personality she has little regard for others and is more than willing to ply her womanly charms to achieve her own selfish goals.
Its the collision of these two personalities, which are spot on, that makes the House of Sand and Fog so compelling. The author of the original novel, Andre Dubus III, deserves credit for so vividly capturing the psychological dimensions of his main protagonists.
The rest of the characters, in the movie at least, are not as well developed. In particular, Mrs. Behrani flip-flops between loving wife and spoiled witch too frequently. Her true purpose seems to be to heighten insight into the Colonel's motivations. Deputy Sheriff Burdon is also a compilation of clichés.
The House of Sand and Fog manages to overcome its extremely contrived circumstances and deliver an intense personal drama worth seeing.
Running time - 126 minutes
Check out my TOP 10 MOVIES OF 2003 & WORST MOVIES OF 2003 lists.
Alternative Reviews:
Roger Ebert's Review
Peter Travers/Rolling Stone Review
Rotten Tomatoes Reviews
House of Sand and Fog Official Web Site