<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:53:22 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Wilbourn&apos;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/</link>
		<description></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2003 Sandy Wilbourn</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:53:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>srw7@earthlink.net</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>srw7@earthlink.net</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<description>Another test</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2003/12/29.html#a11</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:53:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=11&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2003%2F12%2F29.html%23a11</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>This is just a test to see if this still works</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2003/12/29.html#a10</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=10&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2003%2F12%2F29.html%23a10</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/10/14#When:2:30:09PM&quot;&gt;This&lt;/A&gt; is so incredibly cynical in so many different ways. The person responsible should be fired. One, MS didn&apos;t go to the trouble of finding somebody to vouch for XP. It doesn&apos;t mean that the person doesn&apos;t exist, but they could not have even tried to find such a person. Two, it&apos;s such a copy of the current Mac ads (which I guess have real people). At least, they removed it from their site. &lt;/A&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2002/10/14.html#a9</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=9&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2002%2F10%2F14.html%23a9</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.joelonsoftware.com/news/20021008.html&quot;&gt;Joel &lt;/A&gt;talks about the ins and outs of the install that he has written for FogBUGZ.&amp;nbsp; It&apos;s hugely important to spend the time writing a good installation for your product (even if you end up using WISE), and it is one of those things that many software shops leave until the last part of the product development cycle. That&apos;s exactly wrong. As soon as your software becomes good enough to use internally, you need to have an install program for it. You need the feedback on this critical part of your first impression, and you will certainly have to tune it for usability.</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2002/10/08.html#a8</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 04:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=8&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2002%2F10%2F08.html%23a8</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.brook.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb105.htm&quot;&gt;Charles Ferguson&lt;/A&gt; on the problems with broadband. &quot;&lt;FONT face=Arial size=2&gt;The antitrust division of the Justice Department employs more than three hundred attorneys and about fifty economists, but not a single technologist.&quot;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2002/09/05.html#a7</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=7&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2002%2F09%2F05.html%23a7</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A name=When:5:57:11AM&gt;A brief &lt;A href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/moresSource&quot;&gt;response&lt;/A&gt; to Larry Lessig&apos;s &lt;A href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/cooper.shtml&quot;&gt;story&lt;/A&gt; about releasing the source code of MORE. &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/08/29#When:5:57:11AM&quot;&gt;&lt;IMG height=9 src=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/images/2001/09/20/sharpPermaLink3.gif&quot; width=6 border=0&gt;&lt;/A&gt; [&lt;A href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/&quot;&gt;Scripting News&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is another take on looking at the problems of releasing all of the source for something that happened ten years ago. It deals with the fact that the authors are no longer associated with each other in the same entity.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109018/2002/08/29.html#a6</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://scriptingnews.userland.com/xml/scriptingNews2.xml">Scripting News</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=109018&amp;amp;p=6&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109018%2F2002%2F08%2F29.html%23a6</comments>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
