Seb's Open Research
|
Friday, October 03, 2003
|
|
| |
Telepathy of sorts
Alf
releases the code for HeadCloud, and provides his best
description so far of the ridiculously easy
thought sharing service it enables:
HeadCloud
is a Napster-style service, where people connect to a central hub, send a list of the thoughts they want to share, and search the database
of other people's thoughts to see who they want to connect to. It's called
HeadCloud after the original vision - being able to walk down the street and see
little clouds above people's heads that showed what they were
thinking. I
haven't gotten around to using it, as I have yet to embrace Instant
Messaging. (Gosh I feel old.) I could see it being useful for a
tribe-sized cluster of users who already know one another, though. For
instance, it lets you think out loud about a movie that just came out
and that you're
curious about; if someone else happens to also care (e.g. has seen
it/is
thinking about seeing it), the two of you can connect easily using the
title as a bridge. Hey, this might come in handy for Skypers (paging Stuart...)
10:16:50 PM
|
|
GeoPhotoBlog: Name says it all
This, I'm sure, will rip through the blogosphere in no time flat.
Update: it doesn't get updated as quickly as the world as a blog, which limits the interest a bit; I take it back. It won't catch fire now, but it's got potential.
1:05:24 PM
|
|
The straight dope on the Elingsh uinervtisy
Matt Davis [via Gary]:
I work at Cognition
and Brain Sciences Unit, in Cambridge, UK, a Medical
Research Council unit that includes a large group investigating how the
brain processes language. If there's a new piece of research on reading that's
been conducted in Cambridge, I thought I should have heard of it before...
I've written this page, to try to explain the science behind this meme. There
are elements of truth in this, but also some things which scientists studying
the psychology of language (psycholinguists) know to be incorrect.
8:17:20 AM
|
|
TrackBack from comments?
I notice Michael has given up on the heroic endeavor of logging every comment he posted on other sites.
But as I wrote earlier, this is something that should really be
automated. I see four advantages to having a local log of the comments
you posted on remote sites:
- It authentifies the origin your comments;
- It provides wider exposure, both to your writing and to the sites you're commenting on;
- It makes more of your content accessible from your site;
- It makes it easier for you to follow ongoing discussions you're
participating in, or to revisit past discussions that are scattered God
knows where.
Next question is, can we hack this together out of commonly available
parts? Here's one rough idea that might work with systems that support
TrackBack.
- I post a comment on a remote site, leaving my weblog's URL.
- The remote site immediately TrackBack-pings that URL with the permalink to the comment I just made.
- My blog receives the ping and stacks the permalink on top of my comments blog, which is displayed in a sidebar.
Does that make any sense?
This post also appears on the channel lazyweb
7:46:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Thursday, October 02, 2003
|
|
| |
Suffering together
Great quote from a Geffen ex-exec who's pushing for flat-fee distribution of culture [via Alf]:
To act otherwise, to create digital tethers to creativity and
information, would condemn much of the world's population to darkness,
to outdated textbooks and third-hand inspiration. What's worse, it's
the haves who will suffer alongside the have-nots, the former deprived
of the creativity of the latter.
9:59:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 01, 2003
|
|
| |
The curriculum vs. the personal learning network
George Siemens on learning communities and learning networks:
Courses work in an environment when knowledge/information is fairly static and
developing slowly. The more rapidly information develops, the more quickly
courses cease to serve the needs of learners. The information is outdated before
the ink is dry.
[...] learning communities allow us to become knowledgeable in a specific area of
interest...much like courses teach one specific subject matter.
Most of us belong to more than one learning community. These multiple
communities form a personal learning network. If a learning community
equates somewhat with a course, then our learning network is equivalent to a
degree program.
Yes! Definitely. Precisely. Spot on. As the evolution of the different
fields of knowledge speeds up, each crosses a threshold point where it
makes more sense for most learners to give up on courses and embrace
learning networks. In IT this is already happening.
4:39:30 PM
|
|
World of Broadcasters?
Richard MacManus asks, why would normal people want to publish to the Web?
Accurate observations in there. I honestly believe blogging as we
currently know it will never become mainstream. The reason is that it
is a poor fit for anyone who isn’t the (hyper)text-driven, infovore kind of
person.
However, that doesn’t mean that the more general practice of broadcasting information of personal relevance will not become mainstream. My vision of the future in this respect is closest to what Marc Canter’s been pushing under the moniker of “digital lifestyle aggregator”; this also seems to be where Meg Hourihan is heading with the Lafayette project.
Think about restaurant/show reviews, recipes, pictures. The Web is
already full of user-contributed stuff like that; most of it currently
resides on centralized sites like
Amazon. The individuals who help build those sites do so most of the
time with no reward other than a high local profile that is generally non-transferable
(how many Amazon reviewers are on your blogroll?). I’m willing to bet
that many of them would prefer keeping control over their contributions
and putting themselves at the center of their content if systems were available that made that easy.
11:13:02 AM
|
|
Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music
Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music [via Hossein] is
simply great. It features representative samples from loads of
different subgenres, and provides colorful descriptions for each. This
from the Acid Jazz definition:
This kind of
music is best meant for late-night coffee houses and alternative
culture eateries where the waitresses are all short-haired lesbians,
the coffee comes in tall glasses, and there's a small smokey stage
where a crowd of intellectuals wearing dark-brimmed glasses are
listening to some guy in a turtle neck reciting crappy poetry like a
bunch of pretentious post-ginsbergian beatnicks. Ooh yeah! Gotsta love
that post-modern poetry.
I also got to learn about the origin of the ubiquitous Amen break,
about the difference between the TR-808 and 909 ("The 909 is ALL about
the handclaps."), and I discovered a genre I didn't - and maybe shouldn't - know about: Glitchcore, also known as CD Skipping. My only complaint is that I can't deeplink, as this
is a Flash monolith. Still, a wonderful resource.
This post also appears on channel music
9:39:46 AM
|
|
|
|
Monday, September 29, 2003
|
|
| |
Flemming Funch: "You can procrastinate tomorrow."
(By the way, this was not meant to be tongue-in-cheek.)
9:17:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Copyleft
2006
Sebastien Paquet.
Last update:
4/22/2006; 12:13:22 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves
(blue) Manila theme. |
|
|