Seb's Open Research
|
Thursday, November 06, 2003
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 05, 2003
|
|
| |
Charles M. Schulz.
" Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?"/
Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night." " [Quotes of the Day]
11:46:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 04, 2003
|
|
| |
Structured blogging: first steps
In Towards Structured Blogging I wrote about how blogging tools ought
to evolve in a way that allows structured data - such as product reviews - to creep in. Stefan Smalla had similar thoughts around the same time. Marc,
ever the true believer in the value of extensions to the blogging
paradigm, has been pushing those ideas as hard as he could for quite
some time.
Assuming people increasingly care about controlling their own content, such a
development could (among other things) help build a decentralized, open
store of product reviews which might in the long run prove disruptive to centralized review
repositories such as Amazon and epinions - just as the advent of personal blogging tools undermines the viability of weblog clusters such as kuro5hin.org.
Alf Eaton quickly jumped on the idea, building the blam/blaxm duo prototype and later proposing the RVW format. Now, an important development has just taken place: the Blogware blogging tool now supports open reviews. Gary, Alf, Roland, and Marc have written about it, but I think Jonathan Peterson has the clearest story:
Check out Accordion Guy
for a detailed walkthrough. I think most people, however
well-intentioned, won't have the patience to fill up all the fields by
themselves, so I presume the obvious next step would be to enable many
of the input fields to be filled automatically by using metadatabase
queries. (See the part about Musicbrainz in "Towards structured
blogging", and check out how blam gets by with as little as one ISBN number.)
Extrapolating from there, here's what things might look like a few
years from now: Blogging tools have become more general in terms of
what they produce. Basically they've become a personal publishing
interface onto which users can choose to hook a variety of structured
item types. A diversity of item types has sprung up; the most popular
ones are included by default with weblog tools. Lifting item types from
someone else's blog is trivial; creating new ones is only slightly
harder.
Third-party harvesters (Technorati next-gen?) scurry around and compete
with one another to provide meaningful views of the data. In the case
of item types that describe reviews, overall average ratings on any
particular product are easy to look up. However, if you choose to
provide a description of your personal web of trust to those
interfaces (think of blogrolls as a proto-example), you can efficiently
get a sense of what your tribe of
like-minded individuals thinks of that product. It's the
microblogosphere idea again - look up Recommender systems and the microblogosphere for more.
This post also appears on channel social software
8:46:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Copyleft
2006
Sebastien Paquet.
Last update:
4/22/2006; 12:13:26 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves
(blue) Manila theme. |
|
|