Seb's Open Research
|
Friday, February 20, 2004
|
|
| |
Helping ties outlive projects
Tom Smith on how identity can be longer-lived than the course that gives birth to it:
"Using a "standard" tool like IM, means that as the students left the
course and went to work all over the world, the network (or "crews" as
they were known) continued to be maintained. Out there in new media
world, in London, New York, San Francisco there is a "secret" network
still talking."
Something to think about, for instance, when you set up weblogs for a
group of people in a certain context. How long will that context last? Are you
sure you want to tie the blogs to that context?
11:52:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, February 17, 2004
|
|
| |
Competing for attention
Justin Hall on conference backchannels. This is what classrooms will look like a few years from now.
Imagine a conference where half the audience was heckling and
questioning the speaker near constantly. And not just unfounded
heckling, but well-researched contrarian jibes and zinger queries.
Imagine holding your attention on the speaker while their presentation
was being expertly critiqued by the people around you. Now imagine that
all that was happening silently, you could hear the feedback but the
speaker and most of the audience couldn't. Imagine that backchannel
conversation was open to anyone with an internet connection. Then
imagine trying to concentrate on anything.
5:37:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Monday, February 16, 2004
|
|
| |
Filing wisdom
Ron Davis "When you file something ask yourself "Where would I look for this if I was trying to find it?" "
Obvious, but often disregarded.
Generalization: When you're
filing for a group of people, ask yourself, "Where would I look for
this if I were one of these people?"
2:36:49 PM
|
|
The unbearable unwrappableness of social software
Marc Canter:
The business sector is floundering around - trying to "wrap their
arms" around something - that is un-wrappable. Since social software
is not a single market or even single trend - the VCs wanna know
"where's the beef?" "What's the business model?" "Who do we invest
in?"
But the thing about it is - social software is more than a trend or
fad. It's a raising of the bar - bringing humans into the equation of
software. Directly. From now on - all software MUST recognize the fact that humans use
it. That those humans have relationships with other humans and that
those relationships are probably more important than that human giving
money to the software vendor.
11:07:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Copyleft
2006
Sebastien Paquet.
Last update:
4/22/2006; 12:18:10 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves
(blue) Manila theme. |
|
|