<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Tue, 18 May 2004 02:59:26 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Charles Nadeau: Knowledge management</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/</link>
		<description>I am collecting here various items about knowledge management</description>
		<language>en-ca</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2004 Charles Nadeau</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 02:59:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>charlesnadeau@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>charlesnadeau@hotmail.com</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<skipHours>
			<hour>1</hour>
			<hour>2</hour>
			<hour>3</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>0</hour>
			<hour>6</hour>
			<hour>23</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Plogs for increased communication</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2004/05/18.html#a452</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://alterslash.org/#Welcome_to_the_Plogging_World&quot;&gt;Welcome to the &amp;#8216;Plogging&amp;#8217; World&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;table class=&quot;story&quot; cellpadding=&quot;4&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;writeoff&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#ffffff&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Posted by &lt;strong&gt;Hemos&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt;% noise) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&quot;&gt;View&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/&quot;&gt;Roland Piquepaille&lt;/a&gt; writes &lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;No, it&amp;#8217;s not a typo. A plog is short for &amp;#8216;project log&amp;#8217; like a blog is short for &amp;#8216;web log.&amp;#8217; And plogs start to be used as tools to manage projects, especially in the IT world, as discovered Michael Schrage of the MIT. He reports his findings in an article published by CIO Magazine, &amp;#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/archive/051504/work.html&quot;&gt;The Virtues of Chitchat&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;#8221; Schrage found that if plogs are not really commonplace, they&amp;#8217;re not exactly rare. And they are even used to manage large IT projects, such as ERP rollouts. I totally agree with him that a plog is of great value to integrate people in a team or to keep track of the advancement of a project. And you, what&amp;#8217;s your view? If you&amp;#8217;re a project manager, do you use a plog for better control? And if not today, will you use one in the future? &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/2004/05/17.html&quot;&gt;This overview&lt;/a&gt; contains selected excerpts from Schage&amp;#8217;s article which will help you to answer the above questions.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#EEEEEE&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;Tlog?&lt;/strong&gt; - by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/~Mwongozi&quot;&gt;Mwongozi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (Score: 3, Insightful) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&amp;amp;threshold=1&amp;amp;commentsort=0&amp;amp;mode=nested&amp;amp;cid=9174627&quot;&gt;Thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Shoudn&amp;#8217;t a project log be called a &amp;#8220;tlog&amp;#8221;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&lt;strong&gt;b log&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
Projec&lt;strong&gt;t log&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#DDDDDD&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;We all knew it would come to this&amp;#8230;&lt;/strong&gt; - by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/~jiffah&quot;&gt;jiffah&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (Score: 4, Funny) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&amp;amp;threshold=1&amp;amp;commentsort=0&amp;amp;mode=nested&amp;amp;cid=9174605&quot;&gt;Thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 O.K. it&amp;#8217;s time to shut off the internet. Thanks for your participation everybody.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#EEEEEE&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;Following this naming scheme&lt;/strong&gt; - by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/~pavon&quot;&gt;pavon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (Score: 5, Funny) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&amp;amp;threshold=1&amp;amp;commentsort=0&amp;amp;mode=nested&amp;amp;cid=9174590&quot;&gt;Thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Richard Stallman&amp;#8217;s page would be a Freedom Log, one of many in the new flogging scene.&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#DDDDDD&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;Basecamp for Plogging&lt;/strong&gt; - by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/~gokubi&quot;&gt;gokubi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (Score: 5, Informative) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&amp;amp;threshold=1&amp;amp;commentsort=0&amp;amp;mode=nested&amp;amp;cid=9174555&quot;&gt;Thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 I recently started using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basecamphq.com/&quot; title=&quot;basecamphq.com&quot;&gt;Basecamp&lt;/a&gt; from 37Signals for tracking projects. It&amp;#8217;s basically a &amp;#8220;plogging&amp;#8221; system with to-do lists, milestones, file uploading, and one of the most intuitive interfaces I&amp;#8217;ve ever used on the web. I&amp;#8217;ve been tracking internal projects in the way described in the article&amp;#8212;I think it&amp;#8217;s great.&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
It also makes it really easy to make client-extranet plogs where clients can comment on your entries. Really slick.&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#EEEEEE&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;Plogging for defense and security&lt;/strong&gt; - by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/~tcd004&quot;&gt;tcd004&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (Score: 5, Informative) &lt;small&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/05/17/1250233&amp;amp;threshold=1&amp;amp;commentsort=0&amp;amp;mode=nested&amp;amp;cid=9174547&quot;&gt;Thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 See this interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2552&quot; title=&quot;foreignpolicy.com&quot;&gt;short piece in FP&lt;/a&gt; about how military contractors, the Office of Naval Research and Law enforcement agencies are testing plogs on their projects and networks.&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
Tcd004&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://alterslash.org&quot;&gt;AlterSlash (Extended Remix)&lt;/a&gt;]

	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;The article quoted has one thing right to the point: communication should go beyond stakeholder. All the user of the product of a project should be able to look at what the project team is doing (up to a certain limit).
&lt;br&gt;I can easily see how plogs can help information flow, especially when the team members are on 3 different continents.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2004/05/18.html#a452</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 02:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://alterslash.org/rss_full.xml">AlterSlash (Extended Remix)</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=452&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2004%2F05%2F18.html%23a452</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Editing comments without password</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/05/11.html#a282</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bitworking.org/news/Editable_Comments&quot;&gt;Editable Comments&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Now some sites have solved this problem by having you log into the site 
   to post a comment. It works, but when most people are presented with the option
   of &apos;registering&apos; with a site, or not leaving a comment, the usually choose the latter.
   I do this myself all the time. Over the past year of surfing I have not registered with
   a single site to leave a comment. So what I wanted was a system where you could leave a comment,
   and return to edit it at any later time, yet not require registration.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&apos;s the basic description of how it work. Once you post a comment, that comment
   gets a unique &lt;code&gt;ID&lt;/code&gt;. I take that ID and concatenate it with a secret string &lt;code&gt;secret&lt;/code&gt; that only I know,
   then get an MD5 hash of the string &lt;code&gt;ID+secret&lt;/code&gt;. The cgi script that accepts your 
   initial comment returns to you a URL that&apos;s of the form:
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bitworking.org/news/comments/1-3/e0fd9772343dde302f7d709a45856fa8b&quot;&gt;http://bitworking.org/news/comments/1-3/e0fd9772343dde302f7d709a45856fa8b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/code&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where &apos;1-3&apos; is the ID of the comment and &apos;e0fd9772343dde302f7d709a45856fa8b&apos; is the md5 hash.
   When you visit that URL Bulu gets an md5 hash of the &lt;code&gt;ID+secret&lt;/code&gt;, and  if that
   calculated md5 matches the one in the URL then you are allowed to edit the comment.
   Now you can bookmark this URL, and use this URL to edit the comment, and as long as you keep the URL a 
   secret, no one else can edit your comment.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s actually pretty simple once you give up on the idea of registration. You see,
   registration is really asking for more information than is necessary. All I want to
   know is that if you try to edit a comment, you were the person that created that comment
   to begin with. With registration, the server knows &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; the comments
   you have ever left. 
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How secure is it? Well, the URL is travelling over the web in plaintext, and all you
   need is the URL to edit any comment, so I wouldn&apos;t use this to secure the commenting
   system on anything real important. However, this is just a weblog, so I believe that 
   the level of security provided is appropriate for the context. 
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once I have this tested for a few more days I will make another release of &lt;a href=&quot;http://wellformedweb.org/news/6&quot;&gt;Bulu&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;p&gt;Ever dropped a comment on a site and wished you could go back and fix that typo, 
or maybe the next morning you regret the use of the &apos;bollocks&apos;, either way
what you want is editable comments, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://wellformedweb.org/news/6&quot;&gt;Bulu&lt;/a&gt;, the software that runs this site, now supports.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://bitworking.org/news/&quot;&gt;BitWorking&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;Very good way of doing it. It reminds me of the way you access your discussion threads on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quicktopic.com/&quot;&gt;Quick Topic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://udell.roninhouse.com/bytecols/2001-01-24.html&quot;&gt;recommended&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20000304085427/http://www.byte.com/column/BYT19991208S0011&quot;&gt;by&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://udell.roninhouse.com/&quot;&gt;Jon Udell&lt;/a&gt;, where you can create your own discussion thread. Very clever idea.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/05/11.html#a282</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2003 11:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://bitworking.org/index.rss">BitWorking</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=282</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Another toughtful piece from Jon Udel on weblogs for projects</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/03/28.html#a239</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2003/03/27.html#a650&quot;&gt;Publishing a project weblog&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;table align=&quot;right&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/gems/mt.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;190&quot; src=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/gems/mt.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;center&quot; class=&quot;realsmall&quot;&gt;Configuring Movable Type&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
A couple of years ago I &lt;a href=&quot;http://udell.roninhouse.com/bytecols/2001-05-24.html &quot;&gt;predicted&lt;/a&gt; that Weblogs would emerge within the enterprise as a great way to manage project communication. I&apos;m even more bullish on the concept today. If you&apos;re managing an IT project, you are by definition a communication hub. Running a project Weblog is a great way to collect, organize, and publish the documents and discussions that are the lifeblood of the project and to shape these raw materials into a coherent narrative. [Full story at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/03/28/13stratdev_1.html&quot;&gt;InfoWorld.com&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;/i&gt;
 &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/&quot;&gt;Jon&apos;s Radio&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;Another very thoughtful piece by Jon Udell. I should really try to push the idea of using weblog at work. It could stop the &quot;cc craze&quot; we are suffering from. Too many people cc other people about thing that &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; be useful but isn&apos;t always... It could also help us centralize knowledge that is scattered all over the place...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/03/28.html#a239</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/rss.xml">Jon&apos;s Radio</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=239</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>RSS reader for PalmOS</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/23.html#a214</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;Anybody knows where I can find an RSS reader for PalmOS? I would love to read my subscriptions while on the road...</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/23.html#a214</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:23:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=214</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Outlook2RSS</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/13.html#a203</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0106747/2003/02/12.html#a212&quot;&gt;Outlook2RSS - Outlook Folders to RSS Feeds&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;P&gt;So, I took &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.razorsoft.net/weblog&quot;&gt;Peter Drayton&apos;s&lt;/A&gt; slick &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.razorsoft.net/weblog/stories/2002/04/13/google2rss.html&quot;&gt;Google2RSS&lt;/A&gt; and made my own &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size=4&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.hanselman.com/weblog/Outlook2RSS.ZIP&quot;&gt;Outlook2RSS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I&apos;m running it as part of the Task Scheduler and creating RSS feeds for Outlook Folders and Exchange Public Folders (cuz nobody looks in Public Folders, right?) ala:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=&quot;Courier, Monospace&quot;&gt;Outlook2RSS.exe -folder &quot;Public Folders\All Public Folders\For Sale&quot; -title &quot;Corillian - For Sale&quot; -desc &quot;Corillian Employee Stuff for Sale&quot; -link &quot;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://computername/RSSFeeds/CorillianForSale.xml&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT face=&quot;Courier, Monospace&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://computername/RSSFeeds/CorillianForSale.xml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://computername/RSSFeeds/CorillianForSale.xml&quot;&gt;http://computername/RSSFeeds/CorillianForSale.xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT face=&quot;Courier, Monospace&quot;&gt;&quot; -outfile &quot;path/CorillianForSale.xml&quot;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The format for the &lt;FONT face=&quot;Courier, Monospace&quot;&gt;-folder&lt;/FONT&gt; parameter is just a backslash delimited string with like folder1/folder2/folder3, just as Outlook displays it.&amp;nbsp; For Exchange users, you&apos;d do something like: &lt;FONT face=Courier&gt;-folder &quot;Mailbox - Scott Hanselman\Inbox\Spam&quot; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face=Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif&gt;or &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face=Courier&gt;&quot;Public Folders\All Public Folders\For Sale.&quot;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I&apos;m using it as a &lt;EM&gt;Very &lt;/EM&gt;Poor Man&apos;s &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.ingorammer.com/Software/OutBlog/&quot;&gt;Outblog&lt;/A&gt; [regrets to Ingo :)&amp;nbsp;] to publish specific project folders and my Status Updates to my boss from my personal Outlook stash to RSS Feeds.&amp;nbsp; Any MailItems or Posts in an Outlook Folder will show up in the RSS Feed. Maybe I&apos;ll add to what little I did with support for graphics, etc...a client side &quot;pull&quot; model of OutBlog, or make it an Outlook Add-In.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Note #1: Make sure you have the &lt;A href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?url=/downloads/sample.asp?url=/msdn-files/027/001/999/msdncompositedoc.xml&quot;&gt;Office XP Primary Interop Assemblies (PIAs)&lt;/A&gt; and Outlook running on any box you use this on.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Note #2: &amp;nbsp;The feeds it creates MAY look odd on &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.rassoc.com/newsgator&quot;&gt;NewsGator&lt;/A&gt; v0.9, but Greg has fixed this for v1.0.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0106747/&quot;&gt;Scott Hanselman&apos;s Weblog&lt;/a&gt;]

	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;This is extremely interesting. Another thing to try when I&apos;ll be back from India. I can see a lot of applications for this kind of technology at work and at home.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/13.html#a203</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:54:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0106747/rss.xml">Scott Hanselman&apos;s Weblog</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=203</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are doctorates worthwhile?</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/12.html#a202</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2003/02/11.html#a746&quot;&gt;Are doctorates worthwhile?&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;P&gt;asks &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/&quot;&gt;Brian Martin&lt;/A&gt; in his &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/01BRaur.html&quot;&gt;review&lt;/A&gt; of Canadian literary scholar &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.stfx.ca/people/pmilner/a-cude.htm&quot;&gt;Wilfred Cude&lt;/A&gt;&apos;s &lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1550023454/thedundurngroup/103-4440390-4023003&quot;&gt;The Ph.D. Trap Revisited&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=&quot;Century Schoolbook&quot; color=darkblue&gt;The PhD is the accepted apprenticeship into research and has become a prerequisite for academic jobs in most fields. But is it a good idea? The negative view is that studying for doctorates wastes vast amounts of time and effort, produces narrow-minded scholars and discourages recognition of good teaching. Far from promoting research, according to this critical view the doctorate is a serious brake on intellectual creativity.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT color=black&gt;I believe that the Ph.D. may globally be an institution that selects against originality, but there might be pockets of oxygen here and there with open minds where one could come up with a fresh approach and survive. However, things can get difficult afterwards, as&amp;nbsp;Ph.D. hiring practices can also be conservative in most places. It&apos;s hard to be taken seriously when you stand out too much.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Martin &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.louisville.edu/journal/workplace/martinreview.html&quot;&gt;also reviewed&lt;/A&gt; Jeff Schmidt&apos;s &lt;A href=&quot;http://disciplined-minds.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Disciplined Minds&lt;/A&gt;: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives. &lt;/EM&gt;Jeff Schmidt was an editor at Physics Today magazine for 19 years, until he was fired for writing this provocative book. From the review:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;Jeff Schmidt argues that training professionals is a process of fostering political and intellectual subordination. On the surface, this is a startling claim, since the often-stated aim of educators is to promote independent thinking. [...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;There are two key ideological processes in professional education, according to Schmidt. One is favoring students who pick up the point of view of their superiors, behavior Schmidt calls &quot;ideological discipline.&quot; The other is favoring students who direct their curiosity as requested by others, a trait Schmidt delightfully dubs &quot;assignable curiosity.&quot;&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Hm. If there&apos;s one thing I&apos;ve been sorely lacking all my life, it is indeed assignable curiosity. Guess I&apos;m an amateur professional.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Schmidt also draws an interesting&amp;nbsp;parallel between&amp;nbsp;indoctrination as practiced in cults&amp;nbsp;and professional training. But I think there are cult-like aspects in almost all social structures, not just the professional ones. Perhaps they are more important where there is a lot of power to be gained by working one&apos;s way up, though.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/edu.html&quot;&gt;Brian Martin&apos;s writings on higher education systems&lt;/A&gt; are among the most thought-provoking ones that I&apos;ve come across, by the way.&lt;/P&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;I am glad to know I am not the only one asking myself this question. The knowledge I aquired through my doctorate is now completely useless as I work as a system manager and I did my doctorate in atomic physics. However the &lt;u&gt;skills&lt;/u&gt; I acquired (how to teach, work independently, organise my own schedule, manage an always tight budget, etc...) are absolutely vital as I telecommute to work, my clients are scattered across 7 time zones and my boss is 13 time zone away.
It may be true that in certain fields the Ph.D. serves to professionalize the students but this was true in my case. I had the joy to do my Ph.D. under the supervision of an independant thinker who never shied away from a controversy. It taught to be independant and to have the courage of my opinion. Never go with the flow for the flow&apos;s sake.
I put the two books quoted above on my reading list. Hopefully I&apos;ll have a time to take a look at them soon.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2003/02/12.html#a202</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=202</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Scientists cite badly</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/12/15.html#a168</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/14/0115243&quot;&gt;Scientists Don&apos;t Read the Papers They Cite&lt;/a&gt;. WatertonMan writes &quot;Very interesting and sure to be controversial study that suggests most scientists don&apos;t read the papers they cite. This means that if one ... [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;br&gt; 
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;The New Scientist article refered in this Slashdot piece confirmed what I though for a long time: Scientist are bad at quoting. A lot of them know they have to quote the &quot;right&quot; papers even if they haven&apos;t read it. &quot;Quote you&apos;re enemy twice, your friend once&quot; is common wisdom in the community...&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/12/15.html#a168</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2002 06:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rss">Slashdot</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=168&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F12%2F15.html%23a168</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Democratic distributed metadata</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/11/26.html#a164</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.iawiki.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DistributedMetadata&quot;&gt;DistributedMetadata&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt; Instead of having a centrally defined set of metadata, distributed metadata tries to let everyone organise the world as they see fit. The challenge is: how to tie these different ways of organising the world together again?&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.iawiki.net/&quot;&gt;IAwiki&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Not much else over there yet, but the question is a fundamental one. An important problem is how to make people &lt;EM&gt;want &lt;/EM&gt;to tie these ways together. For this I think we have to tap into people&apos;s innate propensity for sociality and curiosity towards new people with a common interest. The idea is to consider categories as rallying points. See &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/10/09.html#a426&quot;&gt;ridiculously easy group-forming&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A class=weblogItemTitle href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/11/20.html#a580&quot;&gt;BlogChannels for loosely joining webloggers&lt;/A&gt;. And if you&apos;re a diehard, join the fun at our &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.aquameta.com/gf/&quot;&gt;group-forming community&lt;/A&gt;. (Will I ever stop those shameless plugs?)&lt;/P&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This is very cool. Imagine a workgroup using &lt;a href=&quot;http://taxomita.com/about.htm&quot;&gt;Taxomita&lt;/a&gt; on their local server. As they browse the web, they can assign metadata to pages linked to their work and compare/aggregate the metadata they assign to the pages.
&lt;br&gt;Given a finite vocabulary of words, one can imagine a &quot;democratic&quot; metadata model: If everybody independently assign words from this vocabulary as metadata to pages, one could look at the words assigned to each page and decide that the word that come the more often is the group official metadata word for this given page.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/11/26.html#a164</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:20:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=164</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>The limitations of Topics in Weblogs </title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/26.html#a131</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/10/25.html#a506&quot;&gt;The trouble with categories&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0111261/2002/10/24.html#a38&quot;&gt;on links and chunks&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;[...] I believe that this approach is not sustainable over time. As the number of categories I&amp;#146;m using increases, it becomes more difficult to scan the possible array of possibilities when I&amp;#146;m making a post. I also find myself reluctant to create new categories and often attempt to &amp;#147;squish&amp;#148; the post into an existing category. The result of this activity is a huge array of topical HTML and RSS repositories that (so far) nobody looks at. [...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0111261/&quot;&gt;Stand Up Eight&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;I agree: categories don&apos;t scale well, yet fine-grained indexing would be useful. There&apos;s a tension there that needs to be resolved.&amp;nbsp;Many good additional points in that post. &lt;/P&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;This describe exactly how I feel about topic. Topics help order my thoughts but they are not &quot;fine-grained&quot; enough to accurately categorise my posts. They cannot be used easily to create hierarchy of topics, going from coarse-grained to fine-grained. However what I like with topics is you can use more than one per posting.&lt;br&gt;It reminds me of the problem I have to sort my bookmarks: If I put them under a hierarchical category, I am limited to only one unless I want to accepts duplicates. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/26.html#a131</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=131&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F26.html%23a131</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zoe and high SMTP port number</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/24.html#a129</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;Looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823&quot;&gt;Charles&lt;/a&gt; is having difficulty getting Outlook to do SMTP forwarding to Zoe. I am still stuck; unable to &lt;I&gt;my&lt;/I&gt; copy of Outlook to add the Internet email service. Can anyone else help him?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://rateyourmusic.com/yaccs/commentsn?blog_id=90000004305&amp;blog_entry_id=412#3136627&quot;&gt;Charles Nadeau @ 10/20/2002 10:52 AM&lt;/a&gt;. I have a quick question on Zoe I dare to ask since I think you played with it quite extensively: Zoe can be used to &quot;intercept&quot; e-mails on their way to the SMTP server if Outlook is configured to reach its SMTP server through Zoe.
I tried to configure Outlook to do so but Outlook can&apos;t accept a port number with 5 digits, only four digits or less. It means I couldn&apos;t enter 10025 as the SMTP port in my Outlook client. And i can&apos;t go in Zoe and change it... &lt;/blockquote&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0101039/&quot;&gt;On The Mark&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am still stuck with this problem, if you have a clue, let me know.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/24.html#a129</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0101039/rss.xml">On The Mark</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=129&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F24.html%23a129</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitch&apos;s brand new PIM project.</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/22.html#a126</link>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.osafoundation.org/mitch/000007.html&quot;&gt;You&apos;re Making a What?&lt;/a&gt;. The product, which is central to the whole undertaking, is a new take on the Personal Information Manager. It will... [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.osafoundation.org/mitch/&quot;&gt;Mitch Kapor&apos;s Weblog&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;br&gt;Here is my wish list: ;-)
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Outstanding&lt;/b&gt; spam protection&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;RSS support. I have a cool idea with this: &lt;blockquote&gt;Imagine I am subscribing to a mailing list that also interest my colleagues. I could set a rule that would move all the e-mails from the mailing list to a given folder and then let my colleagues subscribe to the content of this folder. It could reduce the amount of bandwidth involved in subscribing to mailing list with heavy traffic (like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tux.org/lkml/&quot;&gt;Linux kernel list&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;It would be nice to have folders subscribing to RSS feed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A rich scripting language: I want to be able to trigger actions when event happen. And not only with e-mail: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;When a task is completed, an e-mail may be sent and the task moved to an archive folder.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;When I put my &quot;Out of Office&quot; message on, subscription to my mailing list could be suspended.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I want support for regular expression. It goes with the rich scripting language.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I want a section where I can jot down notes while on the phone. I want to be able to attach to these notes a date/time, contact name, keywords. And I want them to be fully indexed and searchable.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I want to be able to subscribe/post to Usenet newsgroup. The scripting language should be able to deal with this.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I want to interact with a &quot;map server&quot;: If I have an appointment, i want the appointment item to include a map showing me how to go there if I don&apos;t know already.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Finer grain archiving. In Outlook, you can only set your criteria based on time: Archive items older than 3 weeks.&lt;br&gt;I want to be able to say: Archive items older than 3 weeks and those bigger than 200K except those from my boss with an attachment or those from Joe and Bob including the word &quot;Urgent&quot; in the subject line.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I want to be able to assign metadata to any entries/items.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Of course everything will be stored in XML.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/22.html#a126</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://blogs.osafoundation.org/mitch/index.rdf">Mitch Kapor&apos;s Weblog</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=126&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F22.html%23a126</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Making group-forming ridiculously easy.</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/10.html#a116</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/10/09.html#a426&quot;&gt;Making group-forming ridiculously easy&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;P&gt;Weblogs have a potential for group-forming like no other medium. However I&apos;m convinced that much of it to this day remains untapped. I&apos;d like to explain an idea that I have been bouncing around for a while. It might well be a reformulation&amp;nbsp;of what others have said previously. I believe that implementing this properly would give a nice boost to the blogosphere&apos;s social aggregation capability. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically the goal is to push the threshold for&amp;nbsp;group creation to an unprecedented low. I think &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?ReedsLaw&quot;&gt;Reed&apos;s Law&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;should be refined to state:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The value of a group-forming network increases exponentially with the number of people in the network, &lt;STRONG&gt;and in inverse proportion to the effort required to start a group&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Here&apos;s a sample motivating scenario. Not long ago I wrote an item on &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/08/19.html#a135&quot;&gt;professions in the blogosphere&lt;/A&gt;. The post caught the interest of&amp;nbsp;other bloggers. A few replies came here and there. If you search diligently enough you&apos;ll find them, but it&apos;s not easy. Presumably, those who have taken part in the discussion would like to hear about it if the topic comes up again, but currently this will only happen by chance. This kind of situation is very common.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;The topic is pretty narrow. It wouldn&apos;t make much sense to start a Yahoo! group on this. Still, it would be nice to somehow be able to make it into some kind of &quot;focal point&quot; for interested people. If this were very easy, this would allow for quite fine-grained knowledge classification, which would be a boon to those who care for and closely follow particular topics.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, the idea is this.&amp;nbsp;When I come across a post on an interesting theme that seems like it might have lasting value, I want to be able to &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Create a topic, with a title of its own and a definition or description in plain English (which may contain arbitrary hyperlinks). Just &quot;where&quot; the topic is stored is unimportant. The important thing is that it is a public entity. 
&lt;LI&gt;Subscribe to that topic. Subscribing has two effects: it adds the topic to a personal topic list of mine, and it means I&apos;ll get posts by other people on that topic in my RSS aggregator because each topic is associated to a&amp;nbsp;shared RSS feed. 
&lt;LI&gt;Post to that topic whenever I talk about it in my weblog. This has to be *easy*, like checking a box or selecting from a drop-down menu displayed under the box where I write my posts. 
&lt;LI&gt;Access an archive of posts on that topic somewhere on the Web. 
&lt;LI&gt;Let anyone edit the description of the topic when important things are added to the &quot;state of the art&quot; on the topic, or when other related topics spring out of the discussion, to let people know where the conversation has branched off.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically, from where&amp;nbsp;I stand,&amp;nbsp;this sounds a little like a witch&apos;s brew of &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0107808/outlines/liveTopics.html&quot;&gt;liveTopics&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.movabletype.org/news/2002_08.shtml#000571&quot;&gt;standalone TrackBack&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;and this peculiar brand of editable web sites known as &lt;A href=&quot;http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/om.cgi?Wiki&quot;&gt;wikis&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I haven&apos;t worked it out in detail, but wouldn&apos;t it be possible to hack a &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.userland.com/whatIsABeta&quot;&gt;beta&lt;/A&gt; of this together as follows? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Create a public topic database server. 
&lt;LI&gt;Let each topic &quot;know&quot;: 
&lt;OL type=a&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Its name. 
&lt;LI&gt;The address of the web page defining the topic - this is an easy way for people to associate the topic with a Wiki page. 
&lt;LI&gt;The address of a particular RSS feed associated to the topic. 
&lt;LI&gt;The address of the web page that archives posts to that feed. That page could look just like the &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.highcontext.com/kmpings/&quot;&gt;KMPings&lt;/A&gt; page. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Make it easy to create a new topic and register it with the server, by asking minimally for element (a), keeping element (b) optional. Upon registration, the server generates (c) and (d). 
&lt;LI&gt;Modify weblog software to make it easy to post to a public topic. This is the hardest part.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting, I passed it to Philippe and Kevin.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/10.html#a116</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:15:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=116</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Outlook through ZOE</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/09.html#a113</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/10/07/udell.html&quot;&gt;In his article about ZOE, Jon Udell&lt;/a&gt; mentions that he had Zoe interoperate with Outlook.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://guests.evectors.it/zoe/itstories/story.php?data=stories&amp;num=16&amp;sec=1&quot;&gt;ZOE&lt;/a&gt; has a built in POP3 server available at port 10110. However, Outlook 2000 can&apos;t take a port number with more than 4 digits (i.e. a port number lower or equal to 9999). Where/How can you force Outlook to use 127.0.0.1:10110 as the POP3 server to use? If you have the answer, let me know.
&lt;br&gt;I left a note &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/user/view/cs_msg/10373&quot;&gt;at the bottom of the article&lt;/a&gt;. Hopefully Jon will shed some light on the issue.
&lt;br&gt;I played a bit with ZOE and I must say I am IMPRESSED!</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/09.html#a113</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 06:49:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=113&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F09.html%23a113</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zoe to google your e-mail</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/09.html#a111</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/10/07/udell.html&quot;&gt;Googling your email&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/&quot;&gt;Jon&apos;s Radio&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;br&gt;Absolutely brilliant!!! I&apos;ll install it tonight, if I have time.</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/09.html#a111</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 03:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/rss.xml">Jon&apos;s Radio</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=111&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F09.html%23a111</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Radio est disponible en fran&amp;#231;ais.</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/08.html#a108</link>
			<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leweblog.com/telecharger/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://storage1.evectors.it/images/site001302/bigImages/RadioFraWin.gif&quot; width=&quot;167&quot; height=&quot;169&quot; alt=&quot;Radio UserLand Francophone&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leweblog.com/telecharger/&quot;&gt;Radio UserLand Francophone&lt;/a&gt; est disponible en t&amp;eacute;l&amp;eacute;chargement. &lt;img src=&quot;http://static.userland.com/shortcuts/images/qbullets/sidesmiley.gif&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leweblog.com/0000002/&quot;&gt;Radio Userland Francophone&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Radio est disponible en fran&amp;ccedil;ais, bravo!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/08.html#a108</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 06:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://www.leweblog.com/0000002/rss.xml">Radio Userland Francophone</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=108&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F08.html%23a108</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>On adding ThinkBlank&apos;s Metalinker to my blog</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/05.html#a97</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;-1&quot;&gt;[Radio&lt;a style=&quot;color:gray; text-decoration:none;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/&quot; target=&quot;Radio FAQs&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;s]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font color=blue size=&quot;+2&quot;&gt;R&lt;/font&gt;adio Tip:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0107233/&quot;&gt;Dog News&lt;/a&gt;]&amp;nbsp;Here&apos;s one way that&apos;s quite wonderful and integrated right into your weblog. Metalinker by Blogdex for instant blog gratification! Blogdex ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogdex.media.mit.edu/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogdex.media.mit.edu/&quot;&gt;http://blogdex.media.mit.edu/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ) has done it again: they&apos;ve created another great tool for you to keep track of the weblog community&apos;s debates and discussions. It&apos;s easy... really... just go to ThinkBlank at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkblank.com&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkblank.com&quot;&gt;http://www.thinkblank.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, add a little code to your weblog and that&apos;s it. The semantic web is taking shape, bit by bit... (you&apos;ll find out from your own weblog who&apos;s linking to your article (or not) and who&apos;s linking to your posted links (or not). This solution requires javascript, but other than that, wow... and you can put the thinkblank.js in your gems folder (just rename it thinkblank.txt) and call it with the txt extension in your homepage template. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/&quot;&gt;Don W Strickland: RadioFAQ&lt;/a&gt;]

&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;This is a good tool but it is not woven deep enough in the presentation layer of the blog. I don&apos;t want my blog to littered with &quot;[b]&quot;. I want a more visually subtler intergration with the presentation layer. maybe I&apos;ll use it onli in one or two categories if it had value to the information.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/05.html#a97</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/rss.xml">Don W Strickland: RadioFAQ</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=97&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F05.html%23a97</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>My web log is to share information widely</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/05.html#a96</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shirky.com/writings/weblogs_publishing.html&quot;&gt;Shirky: Weblogs and Publishing&lt;/a&gt;. (SOURCE:Clay&apos;s email newsletter)-&lt;i&gt;Another must read from clay Shirky!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;quote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot of people in the weblog world are asking &quot;How can we make money doing this?&quot; The answer is that most of us can&apos;t. Weblogs are not a new kind of publishing that requires a new system of financial reward. Instead, weblogs mark a radical break. They are such an efficient tool for distributing the written word that they make publishing a financially worthless activity. It&apos;s intuitively appealing to believe that by making the connection between writer and reader more direct, weblogs will improve the environment for direct payments as well, but the opposite is true. By removing the barriers to publishing, weblogs ensure that the few people who earn anything from their weblogs will make their money indirectly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/quote&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rolandTanglao.com/categories/klogs/&quot;&gt;Roland Tanglao: KLogs&lt;/a&gt;]


&lt;font color=&quot;maroon&quot;&gt;	&lt;blockquote&gt;Most of us can&apos;t make money and it&apos;s OK. I am not maintaining a web log for profit but to share tidbits of knowledge somebody else could use.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/05.html#a96</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2002 00:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://www.rolandTanglao.com/categories/klogs/rss.xml">Roland Tanglao: KLogs</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=96&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F05.html%23a96</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>How not to render categories</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/04.html#a94</link>
			<description>&lt;div align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;-1&quot;&gt;[Radio&lt;a style=&quot;color:gray; text-decoration:none;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/&quot; target=&quot;Radio FAQs&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;s]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font color=red size=&quot;+2&quot;&gt;Q&lt;/font&gt;uestion:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Please publish step-by-step instructions on how to stop Radio from rendering categories and how to reduce them to mere RSS feeds? I will run out of space before Xmas otherwise. Many thanks!  (Re: this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/2002/10/02.html#a3320&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Radio Tip&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;) [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/&quot;&gt;Don W Strickland: RadioFAQ&lt;/a&gt;]


	&lt;blockquote&gt;Don, should I conclude that deleting everything in a category but the rss file will do the trick? The RadioFAQ you mention doesn&apos;t really help.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/10/04.html#a94</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://dws.us/weblog/categories/radiofaq/rss.xml">Don W Strickland: RadioFAQ</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=94&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F10%2F04.html%23a94</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Using Google to search my blog</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a89</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;I tried to implement the Google search of my site a bit &lt;A href=&quot;http://jrobb.userland.com/2002/09/28.html#a2622&quot;&gt;like John Robb suggested&lt;/A&gt;. In &lt;A href=&quot;http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=1026&amp;amp;p=2622&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fjrobb.userland.com%2F2002%2F09%2F28.html%23a2622&quot;&gt;the comments to this item&lt;/A&gt; somebody mentionned that using &quot;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.google.com/help/operators.html#inurl&quot;&gt;inurl:&lt;/A&gt;&quot; would force Google to only search your blog if it is hosted on weblogs.com. It doesn&apos;t work perfectly: it restricted the search to my site and some others which is a bit annoying.&lt;BR&gt;If you don&apos;t have your blog hosted on &lt;EM&gt;your domain&lt;/EM&gt;, PicoSearch can index&amp;nbsp;it if you have less than 1500 pages. Russ Lipton has &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0100059/stories/2002/04/27/howToImplementWeblogSearch.html&quot;&gt;instructions there&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a89</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=89&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F30.html%23a89</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Piles of papers as &quot;workspaces&quot;</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a85</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.thoughthorizon.com/2002/09/29.html#a79&quot;&gt;Digital Dashboards, Dirty Dishes, Messy Desk, Workspaces and Weblogs&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0104704/&quot; target=_blank&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;Stephen Dulaney&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt; has written an &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0104704/stories/2002/09/24/digitalDashboardsDirtyDishesMessyDeskWorkspacesAndWebLogs.html&quot; target=_blank&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;interesting story&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt; on how he views knowledge management from a personal level. [...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seb&apos;s right, it is an interesting story from Stephen. I like the idea that paper piles are like Groove spaces. I like grouping articles I print by topic or problems they are related to. When&amp;nbsp;I work on a program/problem/concept, I group in a pile all the articles related to the program/problem/concept. When the program is written, the problem solved&amp;nbsp;or the concept learned, I put the articles back in their bin (I use empty cereal boxes to sort my articles/papers)&amp;nbsp;ready to be re-assembled into a &quot;workspace&quot; related to the next program/problem/concept I am working on.&amp;nbsp;Clever metaphor!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a85</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 06:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=85&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F30.html%23a85</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Problem with liveTopics, but Google search works!</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a83</link>
			<description>I am having some problems with the display of my topics. I posted &lt;A href=&quot;http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livetopics-support/message/30&quot;&gt;a message&lt;/A&gt; to the &lt;A href=&quot;http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livetopics-support/messages&quot;&gt;liveTopics Yahoo! group&lt;/A&gt;. I&apos;ll fix it when I&apos;ll have received a hint from somebody.&lt;BR&gt;I finally managed to make &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/2002/09/28.html#a79&quot;&gt;Google search my site&lt;/A&gt;! My readers can now use the best search engine to search my site!&lt;BR&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a83</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 04:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=83&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F30.html%23a83</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>I installed LiveTopics on my blog</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a81</link>
			<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/09/28.html#a364&quot;&gt;Weblog per-post metadata&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0107808/2002/09/28.html#a433&quot;&gt;For a well baked blog, add topics&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.networkcomputing.com/1320/1320buzz2.html&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;Michael DeMaria&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt; over at Network Computing wants weblogs to have topical lists of posts.&amp;nbsp; He points out that the time-based format isn&apos;t the easiest thing to use when looking for specific posts on selected topics.&amp;nbsp; There are obviously two ways find posts contain a specific topic: &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;1) Use a search engine.&amp;nbsp;This is the best approach to use when people are resistant to entering metadata.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;2) Use a metadata tool like LiveTopics by &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0107808/&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;Matt Mower&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color=darkblue&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Matt has built a tool for Radio that makes it easy for authors to enter in metadata with each post. This makes it easy to provide directories that list post by topic (through use of the outliner).&amp;nbsp;Basically, Livetopics can create a simple list of topical links to posts, or a complex hierarchy of topical links.&amp;nbsp;Matt has a complex hierarchy on his site.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://jrobb.userland.com/&quot;&gt;John Robb&apos;s Radio Weblog&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=red&gt;&amp;#187;&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;EM&gt;With thanks to John for the link.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Clearly I think Mike makes a very valid point.&amp;nbsp; Weblogs make great diaries, but the by-date navigation structure sucks for locating topical information.&amp;nbsp; More information about liveTopics can be had by either clicking the liveTopics see-also reference under this post, or going to the &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.novissio.com/products/liveTopics/liveTopics.html&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;liveTopics&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;page on the &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.novissio.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Novissio&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt; website.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0107808/&quot;&gt;Curiouser and curiouser!&lt;/A&gt;] [&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/&quot;&gt;Seb&apos;s Open Research&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I installed LiveTopics today. I think it will help to add more structure to my blog. I am always quite hesitant to add more categories to my blog, I don&apos;t want to reach a point where my taxonomy is so vast an accurate that choosing a category for a posting will become an headache. With LiveTopics,&amp;nbsp;I can add Topics that are in fact a kind of sub-categories. I also like the fact&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;adds a line mentionning where to find other postings with the same topics but belonging to different categories (like software RAID and hardware RAID).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/30.html#a81</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/rss.xml">Seb&apos;s Open Research</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=81&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F30.html%23a81</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google to search MY site!</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/28.html#a79</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;I have added Google search for this weblog on the right.&amp;nbsp; It took&amp;nbsp;five minutes.&amp;nbsp; Since Google indexes my weblog every day now, and it is the best search engine (high quality with&amp;nbsp;fast results)&amp;nbsp;I have seen, there is no better way&amp;nbsp;for me to add&amp;nbsp;search to my weblog.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; If people want to know how I did this, I will post the code. [&lt;A href=&quot;http://jrobb.userland.com/&quot;&gt;John Robb&apos;s Radio Weblog&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes John I want to know more!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/28.html#a79</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://jrobb.userland.com/rss.xml">John Robb&apos;s Radio Weblog</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=79&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F28.html%23a79</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yahoo Finance RSS testing over. now what?</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/27.html#a75</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/&quot;&gt;Thanks for testing our proof of concept RSS feeds!&lt;/A&gt;. Our RSS test is over. We appreciate all the feedback. [&lt;A href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/&quot;&gt;Yahoo Finance RSS Test is Over...&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does it means we won&apos;t get anything amymore?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/27.html#a75</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://rss.finance.yahoo.com/rss/get?ticker=XGV.TO">Yahoo Finance RSS Test is Over...</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=75&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F27.html%23a75</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Channelroll bugfix from Jon Udell</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/26.html#a74</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2002/09/24.html#a424&quot;&gt;Channelroll bugfix, RSS continuity&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;FONT face=Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif size=2&gt;Yesterday my channelroll broke, and began displaying the message: &lt;I&gt;The server returned a SOAP-ENV:Client fault: Can&apos;t create item &quot;.&quot; because &quot;&quot; is an illegal name.&lt;/I&gt; I think I&apos;ve seen this happen on other sites, but I never got the chance to figure out what it meant until it happened to me. Here&apos;s the explanation, and the fix. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;B&gt;...&lt;/B&gt; [&lt;A href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/&quot;&gt;Jon&apos;s Radio&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I implemented the changes,thanks Jon!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/categories/knowledgeManagement/2002/09/26.html#a74</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/rss.xml">Jon&apos;s Radio</source>
			<comments>http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=111823&amp;amp;p=74&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0111823%2F2002%2F09%2F26.html%23a74</comments>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
