<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Sun, 11 May 2003 14:14:25 GMT --><rss version="0.92">	<channel>		<title>Trying Civility</title>		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112534/</link>		<description>Reactions to news and op-ed</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2003 Tom Bird</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2003 14:14:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>		<managingEditor>thomasdbird@attbi.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>thomasdbird@attbi.com</webMaster>		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>		<item>			<title>National poets and national brands</title>			<description>Today in the NY Times, David Brooks opened his column with the quip: &quot;Some countries have national poets, like Pushkin or Goethe, but we have national brands.&quot;  By the time one finishes the column, one learns that Brooks was signalling something like this:  Russians have Pushkin--and pogroms and Stalin and the Soviet Union. Germans have Goethe--and the Holocaust, Hitler, and the Third Reich.  The US of A has national brands--and NONE of the major tyrannies or murderers of the 20th century.  The US of A has national brands--and the longest-running constitutional democracy in the world.  To me it seems fortunate that the unrivaled superpower of the early part of the 21st century is the one that has national brands.</description>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>