|
|
Tuesday, May 06, 2003 |
|
Ten Reasons Why responds to my post about HB 1020. He has good points, but the practicality of the law (which by the way exposes not only publishers, but professors to civil liability) is my concern. For example: What about out of print texts that are provided by copying? What about small presses with titles still in use (100 per year) by classes of obscure topics? What format shall we prepare these files? And, since ADA laws already protect the "print access disabled" does a state law add any value? Would a publisher find a "business decision" to avoid sales in that state agreeable? And, when would a publisher know they are selling to a state student (Amazon, other web sites don't discriminate) -- is that publisher then liable? There are more -- I look forward to the discussion. comment []7:36:58 AM |
|
Being a political hack, I am excited about this...
Cool, huh? comment []7:29:18 AM |
|
The arms race has begun. Yesterday, I posted a link to a story saying the entertainment industry was developing crawlers that can do malicious things to computers they thought were violating copyrights. Today, there is software to counter the threat. comment [] 7:27:07 AM |

