btw.net Weblog
In this age of digital, a critical design point is the architecture of systems (socio-economic, technological, political). If everything can become digital (can be represented as a number) then the relation of that thing to other things becomes very abstract. We begin to think in terms of classes and instances, and how they could interact with other classes. And we risk losing track of the fact that we're thinking abstractly about things that affect real people in this real world. This blog is about the architecture of systems. And how architecture affects the real world.

 














Subscribe to "btw.net Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Saturday, July 29, 2006



news article: What Does 'Organic' Really Mean?
(New York Times, 07/29/06)

read it

what I found interesting was this quote
WHICH foods are worth the higher price? According to an analysis by the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organic research organization, the so-called dirty dozen -- apples, bell peppers, celery, cherries, imported grapes, nectarines, peaches, pears, potatoes, red raspberries, spinach and strawberries -- tend to have a high pesticide residue, even when washed. These are worth buying organic, as is baby food, which tends to be made from condensed fruits and vegetables.

Likewise, meat, poultry, eggs and dairy products that carry an organic label are free of pesticides, synthetic growth hormones and antibiotics. If a manufacturer does not use the term organic, but says the product is "hormone free" or "does not contain antibiotics," "those claims are somewhat meaningful," Ms. Rangan said.

and these links
Environmental Working Group

Consumer Reports' Greener Choices

Consumers Union Guide to Environmental Labels
for example:
USDA Makes Changes in Organic Program Based on 2005 Court Ruling and Congressional Amendment to Organic Law -- Need to Close Loopholes
Last November, over 300,000 letters from people like you were sent to Congress opposing an amendment to weaken organic standards. Despite our hard work and a massive effort by organic farmers, food companies and consumers, a late-night conference committee maneuver resulted in passage of a bad amendment!

The amendment was inserted into the FY06 Agricultural Appropriations Bill and passed. A number of Congressional representatives made statements condemning both the undemocratic process and substance of this change to the organic law.

The USDA is proposing to amend the National Organic Program regulations to reflect the legislative changes made in Congress. The public comment period is only open until May 12, 2006. But the proposal leaves loopholes that could allow:
  • dairy animals that could have been treated with antibiotics, animal byproducts and hormones to be converted to organic production; and
  • numerous artificial (synthetic) substances, including over 500 food contact substances, to be used in organic processed foods without review and approval by the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) and public input.



8:19:26 AM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Russ Savage.
Last update: 7/29/06; 8:21:37 AM.

July 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
May   Aug