<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Fri, 07 Mar 2003 05:09:14 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Monique Svenson: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0119806/categories/recentDecisions/</link>
		<description>Recent Federal Opinions</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2003 Monique Svenson</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 05:09:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>mls@fpkc.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>mls@fpkc.com</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<skipHours>
			<hour>0</hour>
			<hour>1</hour>
			<hour>2</hour>
			<hour>3</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>6</hour>
			<hour>7</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;FONT color=blue&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/8th/022114p.pdf&quot;&gt;Bergfeld v. Unimin Corp&lt;/A&gt;., No. 02-2114 (8th Cir. (Iowa) 02-11-03) - Silica Sand&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Facts&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; An employee of the Dubuque Works Foundry from 1972 to&amp;nbsp;1986 was exposed to airborne dust from silica sand being used in the foundry process.&amp;nbsp; The employee claimed that the manufacturer of the silica sand failed to warn him or his employer of the risk of silicosis&amp;nbsp;associated with exposure to silica dust concentrations below OSHA&apos;s maximum permissible level but above the maximum level recommended by NIOSH.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Holding&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court&apos;s grant of summary judgment to the defendant employer on the grounds that it was a sophisticated user of the silica sand and, thus, the manufacturer had no duty to warn of the risks posed by excessive exposure.</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0119806/categories/recentDecisions/2003/03/06.html#a29</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 04:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=blue&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/5th/0220098pv2.pdf&quot;&gt;Flock v. Scripto-Tokai Corp&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, No. 02-20098 (5th Cir. (Tex.) 02-07-03) - Utility Lighter&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Facts&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;In October 1999, a mother and her son died in a fire&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;their trailer in Conroe, Texas.&amp;nbsp; Official fire investigators&amp;nbsp;concluded that&amp;nbsp;the fire originated in the son&apos;s bedroom and was caused by him playing with the only incendiary device found therein, a utility lighter manufactured by the defendant.&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Holding&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;Fifth Circuit&amp;nbsp;affirmed the district court&apos;s grant of summary judgment to the defendant under Texas&apos; Deceptive Trade Practices Act but reversed and remanded the grant of summary judgment on design defect&amp;nbsp;grounds&amp;nbsp;because the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence of a genuine issue of matieral fact.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0119806/categories/recentDecisions/2003/03/06.html#a28</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 03:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
