POINT -- The Way
The truth points to itself.









Subscribe to "POINT  --  The Way" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.







Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com

 

 

POINT -- The Way

Saturday, 28 June, 2003
 

Nancy "Boy" Pelosi (pronounced "pee-lousy"), U.S. House of Representatives Minority Whip and democrat from California, decided to use President Bush's appearance in California yesterday to attack, uttering one of the most classic remarks ever spluttered from her open trap (you pick the trap) or that of any other democrat's feeble brain.

She said, "California is known for its whine."

The comment is so funny and accurate, and it speaks so eloquently of all whacko liberal leftist neo-communists and democrats, as well as of her as a queen of supercilious self-important saps, that there's no need to comment further.


3:50:48 AM          Google It!


Friday, 27 June, 2003
 

 James Strom Thurmond, former South Carolina Senator, governor, 1948 Dixiecrat presidential candidate, World War II D-Day Normandy invasion soldier -  and diehard racist segregationist  - died yesterday, June 26, 2003, in his home town of Edgefield, Sourth Carolina; he was 100.  At the time of his death, Thurmond was the longest serving senator in the history of the United States, having been elected to the position in 1954.  He still holds the record for the longest bit of filibustering bullshit banter in senate history, 24 hours and 18 minutes, in protest of the proposed Civil Rights Act of 1957.  He was the last politician to have garnered votes from sourthern Confederate veterans of America's Civil War.

Like Lester Maddox, Strom Thurmond was also a democrat.  Staunchly believing that racial integration would lead to totalitarianism, and rather than support democrat president Lyndon Johnson's push for civil rights as a way of manipulating black voters, Thurmond switched to the Republican political party in 1964, thereby being directly responsible and setting the stage for the modern and mistaken belief that it is the Republicans who are the forefathers of racism; truth is that it is the democrats who traditionally were, and still are, the racists, having responded, following their defeat in the Civil War, like spoiled little children throwing a tantrum.

In a 1948 States' Rights convention (states' rights being the real issue for which the racist sourthern Confederacy fought the Civil War, for those of you who went through the liberally biased public education system and, hence, were never taught any of this truth), Thurmond said, "I want to tell you that there's not enough troops in the Army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the Negra race into our theaters, into our swimming pools, into our homes and into our churches."  In December 2002, Thurmond was honored on Capitol Hill  for his 48 years of senatorial service.  Senate leader Trent Lott, Republican from Mississippi, said of Thurmond, "I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him.  We're proud of it.  And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either."  Racist Lott was resoundingly and universally condemned for his comments and subsequently rightly forced to resign his position as Senate Majority Leader.

Did you know that Trent Lott also was once a democrat, having worked as an aide to the racist segregationist democrat Congressman William Colmer?

POINT  --  The Way  bets that you also didn't know that the Eighty-eighth Congress' H.R. 7152, Public Law 88-352, better known as the "Civil Rights Act of 1964" passed  because of the Republican support for the bill?  (The House of Representatives passed it 289-126, and the Senate passed it 73-27.)  Racist democrats were staunchly against the bill, choosing, instead, to continue their support for racism and segregation.  That support continues to this very today through the cover of "affirmative action," which, in fact, is just a fancy term for racism, now officially legal and encouraged.

It is the Republicans who are blamed by the democrats for being the racists, but history and truth prove otherwise.  The democrats talk about their concern for people of color, but their talk is cheap and just a cover for their continuing attempts to con the public so as to steal their votes.  Democrats are notorious for accusing their opposition of doing exactly what they are doing behind your back.  Where there's smoke, there's fire; if a democrat say, "(S)he is lying," you can be sure that there is something there that they don't want you to know, something they want to cover up.  So, look closely, for the truth points to itself.

Old racists are, thankfully, finally dying off, but the legacy they have left continues to haunt America.  Despite typical democrat hypocritical protestations that they are so concerned about abolishing racism, truth is that the democrats continue to leave a trail of destruction wherever they go and on anything they touch.  It will now be at least another 25 years -- 165 years after the emancipation of the slaves -- before the people of America - and the Supreme Court - understand the error of the Court's recent Grutter v. Bollinger decision, before racism is finally abolished in the United States.

Actions speak much louder than the democrats' cheap words.  Thurmond - and ex-Ku Klux Klan member, current longest serving U.S. senator (1958) and "Racist Democrat of the Month" West Virginia Senator Robert C. Byrd - were two of the 21 dissenting democrat Senators who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964! 


6:19:20 PM          Google It!


Wednesday, 25 June, 2003
 

 Lester Maddox, the former restaurant owner cum racist, died today in Atlanta, Georgia; he was 87.  Maddox was a failure as governor of Georgia from 1967 to 1971, serving one term.  Constitutionally prohibited from succeeding himself (although he tried to get away with ignoring the state's Constitution), he thereafter served as the state's lieutenant governor to "Jimmy" Carter, the peanut farmer with the peanut-sized brain who succeeded Maddox and, subsequently in 1977, himself became known as one of America's biggest failures as the worst and most inept U.S. president up to that time.  (Fellow party member bilious "blowjob" clinton, president from 1993 to 2000, is now universally acknowledged as the worst U.S. president of all time.)

However, it is as a symbol of segregationist defiance for which Maddox will be remembered.  He was nationally known for his outspoken opposition to integration.  Resisting the public accommodations section of the federal Civil Rights act by refusing to serve blacks, he chose to sell his restaurant rather than give in to integration.  Pick handles, which he later sold as souvenirs, became his trademark after some of his restaurant customers armed themselves with the weapons to bar blacks from entering.  He once said, "As well as a constitutional human right to associate with whomever you please, there should be a corresponding right to disassociate if you please."  Thanks to the June 23, 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, racism is now not only legal throughout the United States, it is encouraged, but only if it is done cleverly.

So, in the end, even if wicked and wrong, Maddox, as a representative of the immorally racist South following the Confederate defeat in America's Civil War, was "right" all along.

The most interesting thing about the reporting of Maddox's death today, which has been omnipresent in the news, is something that the liberal press en masse has conveniently forgotten to mention, something that became synonymous with racism in the bigoted post-Civil War South and which continues throughout the country to this day, something which POINT  --  The Way addressed in COUNTRY FAIR: Ready, Set, RACE:

Lester Maddox was a democrat!


10:10:10 PM          Google It!


Tuesday, 24 June, 2003
 

Communist democrats (are there any other kind, despite their vociferous lies and attempts to convince otherwise?) want to destroy America.  Accordingly, they have absolutely no respect for the laws of the land that provide the all-important foundation for our way of life.  The Constitution of the State of California, in Article 4, Section 12(c), states that, "The legislature shall pass the budget bill by midnight on June 15 of each year."  There is nothing ambiguous in the wording; it shall be done.  The problem is not that the Golden State's budget for the new fiscal year beginning July 1, 2003 still has not been passed, but that the state's demoncrap politicians (now that all of California's leadership positions are held by these communists) feel that they no longer need to honor California's Constitution or serve the citizens.  They feel that it is perfectly acceptable to dishonor the state's people by ignoring the Constitution.  Interesting to note is how staunchly they quote the document when it suits their evil purposes, while they ignore it the rest of the time, which is typical of demoncraps througout the nation.  ("I have the right to destroy America!")  State Senator John L. Burton, representing District 3, which includes whacko liberal neo-communist San Francisco, when asked why he dishonored and broke his oath to defend the Constitution by ignoring the June 15 deadline, cavalierly said, "Oh, I never really considered that to be a firm date.  Just because it's in the Constitution doesn't mean we have to do it. "

Uum, uhh, then why do we have a Constitution?  Or, more to the point and rather more importantly, WHY THE HELL DO WE HAVE LEGISLATORS WHO PUBLICLY REFUSE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION and, in doing do, refuse to honor, serve and protect the state's citizens?  We must be confused: POINT  --  The Way has always thought that when an office holder places his hand on the Bible and swears the oath of office, he means it, notwithstanding clinton.  Must have just been another democrat lie!  (God will mete out justice in the end, but that doesn't mitigate a current crisis, unfortunately.)

Demoncrap politicians in the national spotlight are not any better.  Despite the truth of the June 23, 2003 Supreme Court decision's legalization of clever racism, several democrats desiring to be king have taken this otherwise good news (to them) as an opportunity to announce that when they become president, they will ignore the United States Constitution and do whatever the hell they want.  Missouri congressional demoncrap Richard "The Dick" Gephardt said, "When I'm president, we'll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any other day."  Someone should tell this nitwit (who must be a product of America's fabulously efficient public education system) that the president's ability to issue an Executive Order does not give him the right to ignore or otherwise override the Constitution, despite clinton's nefarious attempts to set himself up, in truth, as king.  (Ever read E.O. 13083?  Read it very carefully because it is very clever.)  Then there's the King of Idiots, former Vermont "governor" Howard Dean (is this guy related to California's gray "puke" davis?), whose evils POINT  --  The Way previously discussed in DEMOCRATS LEAVE THEIR MARK ON AMERICA; this imbecile said, "The president has divided us.  [an absurd contention, inasmuch as George W. Bush had absolutely nothing to do with bringing before the Supreme Court the case that subsequently legalized racism]  He's divided us by race by using the word 'quotas.'  There's no such thing as a quota at the University of Michigan, never has been."  Seems that dean still isn't paying attention, inasmuch as the Supreme Court decided that the University was, in fact, using quotas, which they did rule as unconstitutional.  Dean is incapable of thinking coherently!  (And this guy wants to be president?!?  Yikes!)  Lastly, there's the coup de grâce from Al "I'll be any color I want" Sharpton, one of America's premier niggers (we're encouraged to say that now, not that we were previously prohibited; call it "diversity"), who said, "Clarence Thomas is my color, but he's not my kind."  This last bit of blather unequivocally means that Sharpton, not to mention the rest of these winners, have no intention of serving all of America's citizens, let alone preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States of America.

A fast way to destroy America is to rewrite - or throw out - the Constitution; demoncraps would just as soon see the latter, but deciding Supreme Court "Justice" Sandra Day O'Connor has gone a long way toward the former (see COUNTRY FAIR: Ready, Set, RACE).  O'Connor will now and forevermore throughout the history of the United States of America be known as the racist judge who legalized and legitimized racism, a black spot indeed on our otherwise great country.  However, notwithstanding her unpatriotic, bigoted and immoral effort, a faster way to destoy America is to elect a democrat as the next president.

You thought clinton was bad for America?  Just wait!  Constitution?  What Constitution?!!!


11:00:00 PM          Google It!


Monday, 23 June, 2003
 

Martin Luther King, who rightly abhored racism, was a man of vision, and he had a dream that all men would be judged by the quality of their character and not by the color of their skin.  Despite continuing and constant democrat lies designed to obfuscate the truth, lies which have, largely, been successful due to the stupidity of the masses, Republicans honor Martin Luther King and also, in truth, overwhelmingly detest racism, believing that the color of a man's skin should be irrelevant in an advanced modern society.  Our society, sadly, is not nearly as advanced or modern as we would like or otherwise like to believe, and the democrats and leftists are responsible for this (but at least they are responsible for something).  Truth is that racism still exists in America because the democrats and leftists don't really want it to disappear.  They would rather dishonor King and everyone of color - any color - than lose the power that they have stolen for themselves through all means immoral.  Yes, some Republicans are racist, but "racist" does not mean "Republcan."  However, in 2003 and in contrast, "democrat" is tantamount to "racist."

Racist United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor today cast the deciding vote and wrote the majority opinion effectively legalizing continued racism in America, thereby virtually rewriting (without due process) the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Although O'Connor and the court ruled in Gratz v. Bollinger that any system that abritrarily gives a bonus to someone based upon his race is unconstitutional, it contrarily ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that racism is allowable, acceptable and desirable if it is done cleverly so as to hide its overtly immoral nature.  Racism and racial quotas that are not called "quotas" are now sanctioned in America.  However, POINT  --  The Way submits that ALL racism is WRONG!  As David Horowitz of FrontPage Magazine.com says (with which we agree), "The Court's reasoning was that the... policy was "narrowly tailored" to provide diversity.  But why is diversity that includes three groups - African Americans, Hispanics and native Americans - more important than a diversity that would include, say, Vietnamese and Cambodian Americans, Jewish Americans, Sri Lankan Americans, Russian Americans, Irish Americans, Indonesian Americans, Rumanian Americans and others?  The Court didn't say."

So, whites can now get away with discrimination and racism, as long as it is done in a clever manner that masks the true nature of the offense.  For that matter, so, too, can anyone of any race.  If, however, you are a member of one of the three special races singled out in the ruling, you can be a racist and get away with just about anything, regardless of the quality of your character.  A white racist is a racist, but a clever white racist or a black overt racist is now "diverse."

There is nothing fair about racism, which is why Republicans rightly want all racism to cease to exist.  To the democrats, "fairness" is just another one of their lies.  Demoncraps continue to talk about "fundamental fairness," but the truth is that their promulgation of racism is the foundation of their ability to con people into voting for them.  Think about it: democrats have been talking for 35 years about doing such wonderful things for people of color; yet, very little has changed, with many, if not most, blacks and hispanics in America still living in the gutter.  Where now is all that democrat "fairness" and "help," and what has it produced for all people of all races?  (Wouldn't it be fair, afterall, to help all of us, not just a select few of us?  Truth is that this select few is the democrats who have stolen your vote!)  The demoncrap politicians have not actually helped one iota.  Why not?  Democrats are the biggest racists of all, and their policies promote poverty and a "gutter trash" lifestyle.  (Don't forget that West Virginia Senator Robert C. Byrd was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, a fact that is conveniently overlooked when the demoncraps accuse their enemy, the Republicans, of being the racists.)  The 'craps talk a good tale to get the votes, but they have had their chances and have, in fact, done nothing but ensure that racism continues.  They don't really want racism to disappear, for, if it were to do so, they would no longer have the excuse they use to con your vote away from you.

Today's Supreme Court decision ensures that, for years to come, the country will become more racist, not less.

Why are the democrats, who have failed America and her people, not judged negatively on the quality of their (lack of) character?  Why, instead, are they judged positively on how "fair" and racist they are?  Truth is that democrats are nothing if not untruthful, immoral - and racist.

Martin Luther King is rolling over in his grave.


12:00:00 PM          Google It!


Saturday, 21 June, 2003
 

POINT  --  The Way exists to point to truth.  No, we're not here just to speak of gray davis, but this bozo continues to provide such fertile ground that we cannot resist.  Now contributing to the lies are San Francisco mayor Willie "I like being a pimp" Brown and California "senator" Dianne Feinstein, demoncraps all.  The three appeared today at (and, of course, took credit for) California's new San Francisco Airport BART extension opening.  Brown is a professional cocksucker, and he refused to take his watermelon-flavored penis out of his mouth long enough to speak coherently as he took the microphone, dribbling something about all recall supporters being a "bunch of spoiled losers."  Feinstein, hoping to make up for Brown's fumbling and slippery stoned-like blather and make the demoncraps appear as though they had IQs above room temperature  then announced that "I am not a candidate" to replace davis when the recall effort to remove him from the office of California Governor qualifies for the ballot.  (This is just typical demoncrap-speak designed to obfuscate the truth and lie to the people in a way such that they won't notice.  Note the way she said it: she's not a candidate now, but failed to say that she wouldn't be a candidate later.)  She did say, however, that, "...the recall is really there for gross moral turpitude, corruption, or some extraneous terrible circumstance in which you have to remove somebody from office."  This is another fine example of a demoncrap politician assuming the role of king, deciding for the people what they should think.  Someone should remind this classless cunt that the people, in fact, do not need a reason to recall a sitting governor, or any other legislator for that matter.  The law does not mention anything about "gross moral turpitude, corruption or extraneous circumstance."  The people can recall any crap politician because they don't like the color of their dress, if they wish, and they do not need to state that, or any other, reason.  It just so happens, however, that davis is guilty of all of Feinstein's conditions, and, given that none of California's demoncraps will do so, it is the people who are taking responsibility "to remove davis from office."  It's about the people, not these lawless back-stabbers!

davis added his own beauty, as well, whining that the recall effort will, "...not create one new job, not help one child, not help the budget crisis and not move the state forward."  OK, let's make sure we understand him objectively: davis rapes the multi-billion dollar surplus left by previous Governor Pete Wilson, leaves the working citizens of the state with a current deficit of $39 Billion (and still growing daily), has the intention in the new state budget of further stealing even more of workers' hard-earned money to cover up his ineptitude, leaves California with schools failing the kids and leaving them unable to read or add,  with state crime levels on the increase and businesses moving out of state and taking the jobs with them.  This is just SO TYPICAL of democrats!!!  Good job, gray!  If this isn't gross moral turpitude, corruption and extraneous terrible circumstance, then, please, someone show me what is.  davis is relying on the clinton defense: blowjobs under the desk, the murder of enemies and lying in court are all completely moral, so how could screwing the people who pay for davis's failures possibly qualify as anything negative?  davis is just lying, as all demoncraps do, with his "not this, not that" rhetoric, obfuscating the truth by using the politics of personal destruction, at which democrats are expert.  The only moral fiber that davis has is the "value" of hypocrisy!

Uum, uhh, yeah, sure, gray.  You just keep thinkng these things as California's citizens yank your sorry scum-sucking ass out of Sacramento!

Truth is that California only can - and will - move forward, and HOW HAPPY WE'LL ALL BE, once gray davis is long gone (and, preferably, dead) Besides, his hair - and all the rest of these evil prevaricating demoncraps - are all immoral and inhuman(e)!

P.S.:   BTW, do you have the same hair style that you had over 40 years ago (assuming you were alive)?  No, we didn't think so.  Davis's coif in and of itself elegantly speaks for how out of touch he is!  He should be put out of our misery for that alone.


11:08:25 PM          Google It!


Thursday, 19 June, 2003
 

Liberals, as irrational and hypocritical as they always are, generally seethe with venom, and their latest target is the purportedly "omnipresent conservative" media.  Anyone with an IQ above room temperature knows that this is just another typical leftist lie: "Attack the opposition and accuse them of what we are doing, so as to deflect the truth away from us."  These days, the media is generally anything but conservative; just look at the Always Broadcasting Communism, Communist Broadcasting Station with Spam Blather, Now Broadcasting Communism, Communism News Network (or is it the clinton News Network?) and the Promulgating Bull Shit television stations: pure leftist drivel.  Nor are newspapers innocent: take the New York Times ("All the news that's fit to lie about") or the Left Angeles Crimes, for examples.  Millions watch, hear and read this crap, and exceedingly few do so with an eye or ear that is at all objective enough to see through the neo-communist slant.  (Granted it is done oh-so-cleverly - easier to fool the masses that way, and even easier to fool the undiscerning fools.)  Truth is that the liberals are, just as a spoiled child, envious of the attention that the Limbaughs, Hannitys, Hewitts, Hedgecocks, Reagans, Savages, etc. are finally getting, and liberals are nervous that they will be "outed."  They only have themselves to "blame" (not that liberals take responsibility for anything).

During the 2002 California Governor's election campaign, numerous sites sprung up blasting, as only the lib commies can do, Republican candidate Bill Simon.  One even comandeered the www.billsimon.com URL only to put up a vociferously venemous site that asks the question, "CAN YOU TRUST THIS GUY? as Governor??!!" (sic).  In light of "governor" gray davis's unprecendented malfeasance, the question now seems incredibly and unusually poignant, inasmuch as the citizens of the state of California are now asking that very question as they sign the recall petitions to throw the election's victor on his ass and out of office.  Citizens now realize - finally - that it is davis who can not be trusted.  Some of us knew this before the election, but the naive couldn't - and didn't - care less.  Now we are all suffering for the stupidity of the masses.  It was davis who was the worst of two evils.  It was davis who was, and still is, the liar, who lied about how he raped California's economy, who lied about fellow office seeker Dick Riordan and about candidate Simon (among numerous other things, including the "energy crisis" scam).

Simon's claim to fame became his having barely lost the election.  He might have won if the state's demoncrap votors had the integrity to actually objectively think about his qualifications.  Instead, though, they avoided Simon like the plague and failed to even rationally (what else is new?) consider one choice versus the other.

YIKES!!!  Now, it's a new day, and, believe it or not, I may actually agree with the libs on one single count (I haven't heard them whine about this lately, but give them time): Bill Simon, like davis, cares not about the people of California but only about himself!  This is additionally evidenced today by the God-awful news that Simon is considering running again as the Republican candidate for Governor, if the recall effort succeeds in making it to the ballot.

MAY GOD HELP US ALL!

POINT  --  The Way says that this would be an unequivocally unmitigated DISASTER!  Yes, the demoncrap voters now realize the error of their ways and are willing to pull davis out of Sacramento and shove his head further up that hole he sits on, but they are not sensible enough (ok, at all!) to even consider looking at Simon rationally.  Simply put, if Simon runs again, davis will remain governor because the demoncrap voters will not even consider ousting davis if it means getting Simon.

The ABSOLUTE WORST thing that can happen for Californians - and the recall - is to have Simon run again.  Whether anyone agrees or not with Simon's political views is irrelevant; the relevant issue is the fact - the truth - that demoncrap voters will never look at Simon objectively; they are incapable of doing so.

The clock is ticking and it is one second until midnight!  Please, Bill, give us a fighting chance.  Do what is really important for California.

If he really cares about Californians, POINT  --  The Way says that Bill Simon should just SHUT UP AND GO AWAY! 


11:59:59 PM          Google It!


Tuesday, 17 June, 2003
 

California's gray davis is like a little puppy running away with its tail between its legs.  The problem is that davis is supposed to be an adult, not to mention the state's governor.  He is confusing "governor" with "dictator."  Notwithstanding clinton, who got away with lying in a court of law, responsible adults tell the truth.  (OH! - That's right!  clinton was anything BUT a responsible adult!)  Perhaps davis is modelling his behavior after clinton, figuring that all demoncrap politicians should also be able to get away with screwing the citizenry.  For the most part, they do.  However, the people of California are waking up and are recalling davis.  If you want to know why, check out the Shades of Gray website, which is tracking davis's campaign promises and goals, a fancy way of keeping track of his lies and malfeasance.

Last weekend, davis publicly whined, "Look, this recall is just a bunch of sour grapes by a bunch of losers."  Brilliant!  Truth is that davis is the loser!  The comment has only further fueled the people's anger toward him, and the number of signatures on recall petitions has picked up dramatically.  Truth is that davis is gonna get what he deserves, thank God!


7:47:01 PM          Google It!


Saturday, 14 June, 2003
 

 California "governor" gray "beige" "puke" davis claims he is not afraid of the recall effort currently underway in America's most troubled state.  POINT  --  The Way previously discussed this in several pieces: DAVIS BUDGET TAXES CITIZENS' PATIENCE, CALIFORNIA POLITICIANS SHOW LEADERSHIP AS CRIME INCREASES, FURTHER EVIDENCE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR davis' MISCONDUCT and RECALL CALIFORNIA'S SCUM “GOVERNOR” gray davis. 

For a guy who is unafraid that California's citizens are gonna yank his criminal ass out of office, he surely is spewing venom, and his rhetoric is certainly polished and duly memorized.  Today, he pointedly told one TV station, "Look, this recall is just a bunch of sour grapes by a bunch of losers," sounding more than a little annoyed and offended that he would even be asked about it at all.  He told another station, "The recall movement is sponsored by a bunch of losers.  I won the election fair and square!!!"  Someone should have told davis that it's not about him; it's about the citizens and their needs!  davis is supposed to be serving us, not we serving him!

WhaaaaaaWWWHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Sounds like another typical demoncrap politician whining when he doesn't get his way.  The demoncraps are, afterall, experts at the politics of personal attack and destuction.  It is debatable whether or not davis won "fair and square," inasmuch as he lied to the state's citizens about his failure to properly manage the multi-billion dollar surplus that he inherited from former Governor Pete Wilson.  davis wasted the surplus and then lied about California's financial condition to get the voters to believe that he had been a fiscally responsible leader so they would vote for him.  Now that he's been reelected, the truth about davis and his criminal behavior is out, and the voters don't like it a bit.  He may think it's sour grapes, but the voters have the right to remove any legislator, which davis feels is unfair; afterall, he knows all about how to be unfair!

The voters, in fact, have a responsibility to remove davis, who's record of malfeasance is now nothing short of infamous.

davis claims that the recall effort is doomed, which is why he is now ignoring his responsibilites as governor, spending time, instead,  raising funds to fight the recall.  davis, not afraid?  He looks - and speaks - with fear and disdain for those who would challenge his "right" to screw them.  However, davis has thusfar refused to publicly acknowledge what is, at this point, a virtual certainty: the recall effort will qualify for the ballot, and the citizens will again have a chance to decide just how much of a "leader" davis really has been, now that the truth is out.  In the almost daily polls, the overhwelming majority of the state's citizens, both Republicans and democrats, say that they will vote to remove davis from office!

Truth is that davis should spend the remainder of his life, not to mention his term, in PRISON He WILL be recalled, making history as the first governor of any state in the history of the United States of America to be removed from office.  I can see him now, whining "sour grapes" and "losers" as the state police physically yank his sorry ass out of the state capital after he loses - on merit!  This vision reminds me of Romania's former communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife, who, on December 25, 1989, allthewhile whining about "sour grapes" and "losers," were tried for crimes against the people, found guilty and IMMEDIATELY taken out the back door of the court and SHOT!   The whole thing took about 20 minutes, and they were literally still whining as the bullets went through their heads, dropping them to the floor in a heap of evil perverted flesh.  (There's a wonderful piece of film of this fabulous moment of justice.)  Sounds like just the thing for davis, and what a terrific Christmas present it would make for the good citizens of the Golden State.  The people's gun is loaded, and I am already avidly praying for the magic bullet.

If you want to help, click on the link and do your part before davis further does you!


11:18:17 PM          Google It!


California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell has decided that many of this year's "graduating" high school seniors are unable to read or add.  O'Connell is just another typical demoncrap politician; his website even contains a link to "No Child Left Behind," something he is willing to lie about, to make himself look good, but is unwilling to honor with deeds!  Instead, to honor his commitment to these childrens' feeeeeeelings, he has decided to CANCEL this year's California High School Exit Exam.  Afterall, he wouldn't want these children to graduate later than all their friends, even if they would then be able to read and add 2+2.  God forbid that the test should actually find out what a failure O'Connell is and what a joke public education is these days.  God forbid that the kids should actually be held back to prepare for their life ahead.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense: "Let's just look the other way."

Demoncrap bullshit!  And guess who gets to pay for this continuing blunder?  You got it - US!

This, of course, begets the question, "Who is more stupid, O'Connell or the kids who would have flunked the test?"  Those of us with IQs above the month portion of the date easily know the answer to that one.  O'Connell doesn't give a shit about the kids and is more than happy to spurt them out into society to fend for themselves.  It borders on being criminal, and it is lost on this idiot bozo that these kids, within seconds of "graduating," will be running to the Department of Public Social Services to keep them alive, given that they will be unable to get jobs with their deficient "skills."

All POINT  --  The Way can say is stupid is as stoooopud does!  I hope O'Connell gets shot by one of these "graduates!"  What could be better than taking out two idiots with one bullet?


11:11:11 PM          Google It!


Friday, 13 June, 2003
 

Ya' know, sometimes, I just don't know about what to write, not because there's too little, but because there's too much.  There are so many scams going on at any one time that they are virtually impossible to avoid.  The really sad part is that most of the scams are completely legal.  "Governor" gray davis in California continues to screw the citizens; in a fiscal crisis with an all-time record $38 Billion deficit (currently, and increasing at the rate of about $55 Million per day), his proposed new state budget actually increases the amount that the state's demoncrap politicians want to spend - and it all comes out of the wallets of those citizens who work and pay taxes.  Once again, the demoncrap "leaders" treat the citizens' money as if it were theirs to spend as they wish, while they treat the citizens like shit.  Sounds like communism to me.  You would think that with a deficit that is larger than that of all the other states combined, and the largest for any state in the history of America, the politicians would be striving to lower what they spend, not increase it.  At least California's Republican legislators are refusing to give in to davis, insisting that what the state spends be reduced.  At least someone in California has some business sense, and it ain't davis, who is destined to be the first state governor in the history of America to be recalled.

Then, there's gasoline.  Now, after conniving the buying public into thinking that the market is stable, the price of gasoline is going up again (or is it still?).  The oil companies are claiming that a "loose gasket" in a northern California refinery is the culprit (really - I saw the representative claim this!).  No one believes the oil company spew, but they have us by the balls.  There's something unethical and immoral going on here.  Why aren't the protestors spewing about this?

How about the "looted" Iraqi Museum of Antiquities, about which the liberal leftist neo-communist whackos whined oh-so-vociferously?  Truth is that the "looters" were the museum's employees who, in fact, took the priceless works to their homes for safe keeping.  Almost all of them are safe.  The majority of the media has conveniently failed to report the truth of this.  Where are the protestors now?  OH, that's right: they're frothing about the missing WMDs.  Nevermind that a 2-liter bottle of anthrax could kill tens of millions of people and is easy to hide.  Nevermind that Hussein has already used WMDs against his own people, killing well over a million of them; the fact that the weapons have to exist to be used is lost on the idiot libs.  And let's not take notice of the numerous mass graves that continue to be found almost daily, with scores of thousands of bodies already having been found; the fact that Hussein is a mass-murderer on the scale of Hitler and Stalin is something we're supposed to ignore: we are supposed to feeeeel sorrrrry for Hussein because his life must be so tough, having to control all those people while defending himself from that big bad bully, George W. Bush.  Why aren't the protestors whining about the BILLIONS worth of state owned oil currency converted to dollars that Hussein kept for himself and failed to use to help "his" people, not to mention the millions of bodies left behind from his insane murderous rampages?

Let us also not forget the truth that the Palestinians are just another bunch of A-rab punk-ass thugs, masquerding as adults.  While POINT  --  The Way says that the Palestinians should have their own state, I know the perfect place for it: on the top of a floating piece of South Pole Antarctic ice.  They can have it all for themselves, and they can do with it as they will.  Oh, by the way, in order to protect the rest of the world from these criminals, we're gonna blockade the damn thing - nothing in or out!  I'm crying!  In the meantime, though,  the Bush "roadmap to peace," sadly, is a joke.  Bush really does mean well, which is lost on the leftists, but the fact is that the Palestinians don't want peace or their own state: they want the complete and utter destruction of Israel and every Jew in the world.  Sounds anti-semitic to me, this anti-semitism also being lost on the libs.

Back to the libs. Sigh!!!  They are such hypocrites.  What's good for the goose is never good for the gander, when they are the gander.  Stoooopud!  Immoral.  Frequently illegal.  Double-sigh!!!

What to write about?  The world has gone crazy because evil has not been reigned in.  We've left the asylum door unlocked, and the inmates are running loose running the show.  Thank God the Republicans are in control and bringing at least a small amount of sanity back to society; the demoncraps never were in control, only riding the 12-year-run coattails of the previous Republicans while clinton murdered those who could expose him (or Hillary, ala Vince Foster and Ron Brown), sold our country out from under the noses of the citizens (ala NATO control and ownership of all inland American waterways - betcha ya' didn't know about that one, did'ja?) and lied in courts of law, all to have his dick sucked under the Oval Office desk in order to teach today's teenagers that oral sex isn't sex.  ("It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is.")  It's always that way: the Republicans fix things and the demoncraps steal everything, fuck everything up and leave it to the Republicans to fix again.  Sigh!!!  Don't worry if you're under 40 and still believe in the "goodness" of the demoncraps; there's still hope for you because life will continue to kick your ass until you, too, either wake up - or die!  You just haven't been fucked enough to recognize yet what truth is!  There's a phrase about this.

And it's not just the big things.  The little things are screwed up, too.  Today, in Oakland, California, when approached by police officers who wanted to question him about an armed robbery that had just been committed, a 16 year old "boy" pointed a complete facsimile of a semi-automatic handgun at the officers, who, fearing for their lives, shot and killed the kid.  His gun was an unbelievably good fake, appearing identical to the real thing unless perused  from 9 inches away.  No wonder the police feared for their lives.  If the "kid" was so stoooopud as to point something that so closely resembled a handgun at the police, they did exactly the right thing; POINT  --  The Way is glad that the "kid, all 6'2", 185 punds of him, is DEAD!  One less punk-ass on the streets to fuck it up for the rest of us!  But, inasmuch as the gun was a fake, albeit a really good one, the protestors are whining about the cops killing an unarmed "child."

Back to the libs again.  Sigh!!!  What to write about?  I think I'll just skip it today.


11:52:41 PM          Google It!


Tuesday, 10 June, 2003
 

Chief weapons "inspector," Swedish lawyer and diplomat Hans Blix, known for his failure to do his job as a weapons inspector prior to the recent United States-Iraq war, has decided against continuing his position as the chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission; his current contract expires June 30th.  Thank God!  His Deputy U.N. Weapons Inspector, Dimitri Perricos, has now taken over for Blix.  In the meantime, Blix is making sure that his own face is splattered all over the television screens as he accuses members of President Bush's administration of "dissing" him in the press.  If it's one thing the libs know how to do, it's whine!

Blix followed in the crap filled steps of such incredibly efficacious and attentive "inspectors" as Scott Ritter.  POINT  --  The Way has a few observations and questions: What the hell was a lawyer and "diplomat" doing looking for dangerous weapons of mass destruction?   Blix is incapable of recognizing anthrax from table salt.  Why did the U.N. have him looking for WMDs?  It makes sense to have an inspector know something about weapons; Blix knows nothing about WMDs and was, obviously, inept, at best, in this regard.  Blix's real job, certainly, wasn't to find WMDs but, rather, to kiss Kofi Annan's and Hussein's butts and make them look good, although we don't quite understand how either could ever be made to look that good: one is a moronic and useless fool, and the other is a cold-blooded mass-killer.  Here is a guy who has spent his entire life lying and kissing ass, and we're supposed to believe anything he says about Iraq or anything else?  Blix is just another whacko liberal leftist neo-communist who would just as soon have his tongue used by Hussein for toilet paper than to actually turn him in for failing to abide by the U.N.'s resolutions.  He was single-handedly instrumental in further enabling Hussein to get away with murder.  Accordingly, Blix should get what he deserves: a long prison sentence, not his face on TV!  It should additionally be noted that the truth is that the U.N is just as inept as Blix.  Neither have any balls; both refused to back up their call of Hussein on his murderous ways, and both have now aptly deomonstrated their ineffectiveness, inefficiency - and irrelevance.

POINT  --  The Way is not disrespecting Blix because there's nothing there to respect.  The world doesn't yet realize it, because the liberal whackos are preventing it today, but future generations will realize and be thankful that President George W. Bush DID have the balls - and the guts - to make the world safer by freeing the Iraqi people and rendering moot Hussein's ability to use his hidden WMDs.  President Bush, we thank you!  Mr. Blix, shut the hell up, you worthless weasel!  Despite your best efforts to make excuses for Hussein, the WMDs will be found because the truth points to itself!


12:34:56 PM          Google It!


Sunday, 08 June, 2003
 

Another clinton is whoring it up again (or is it still?).  Yup, this time it's hillary.  Instead of attending to the people's business, as a junior senator from New York, she is on the liberal press circuit conning radio and TV announcers, interviewers, newscasters and hosts into having public sex with her as a way of selling her new deceitful and prevaricating tome.  At least it seems like sex inasmuch as the "hillary talk" is everywhere, and it's all nothing but self-important, self-aggrandizing mutual masturbation.  That should make the ratings go up, particularly in California.  POINT  --  The Way already discussed this scum in cLINTON NUDES -- OOPS, we mean NEWS.  She is, obviously, actually breathing harder and more, not easier and less.  We can only hope....

Is anyone actually watching or listening to her crap?  No, we didn't think so.  At least the majority of Americans, thank God, are not falling for her latest blather!  She lies more than Chicken Little, and we're not gonna take it anymore.  No one with an IQ above room temperature is watching or listening, which speaks eloquently of the whacko liberal leftists (that California bunch) who breathlessly await her every word.  Just think: Talk about the clintons being immoral; hillary is into group sex!

YUCH!

P.S.:   For further hillary whoring, here is a hilarious hoot: Is Hillary The Biblical Whore Of Babylon?


11:45:00 PM          Google It!


Thursday, 05 June, 2003
 

The United States House of Representatives has passed a bill that bans partial birth abortions.  POINT  --  The Way hopes that the differences between this bill and the one already passed by the U.S. Senate are worked out quickly so that this much needed protection is immediately signed into law by the President.  The "womens' rights" groups are already whining.  Think about this, though: truth is that they are protesting for their right to have irresponsible sex and to murder their unborn child.

You do know how a partial birth abortion is performed, right?  The baby is wholely delivered feet first, with the exception of its head, which remains inside the mother.  The abortionist-murderer then punctures the baby's skull and sucks out the brains; the skull collapses, the head is then pulled out and -- OH, LOOK!  OOPS, THE BABY IS DEAD.  OH WELL.

One of the worst and most damaging things that has ever happened to America (and the World, for that matter) was the 20th Century Roe v. Wade decision allowing abortion.  Since then, men casually and uncaringly screw their many and any women and uncaringly walk away, leaving countless murders AND innumerable latchkey kids behind in their wake.  Since then, women have refused to take any responsibility, gleefully spreading their legs to guide the missile home, and the consequences be damned.  Since then, family values and, with them, the mere concept of families - and families themselves - have crumbled.  Since then, "womens' righters" and their enablers, the democrat politicians, have only raised the level of their whining in favor of their "rights" (to murder), almost as if they know how immoral it is and that screaming about it will obfuscate that truth (which it has, to some extent).  Yet, they also scream equally violently about how much they care for the children, something that "president"  "billy jack" clinton used to garner voters' "guilt factor" sympathy votes (i.e., "...how could I not vote for him?  He cares...").

Truth is that the liberal left, "womens' rights" groups and the democrats only care about themselves, first, formost and always.  They talk up a storm about how much they care, as they continue to butcher millions of just-being-born children every year.  Does anyone see another typical hypocritical democrat conflict here?  POINT  --  The Way certainly does.  It's about time that America wakes the hell up and calls these murderers on their uncivil and immoral acts.  Abortion has been one of the root causes of the massive destruction of America seen in the last 30 years.  However, you can't have it both ways: it's either "We don't really care, we murder babies because we are selfish and we are, at least, honest about it because we don't claim to care for the children," or "We care, we actually DO value life instead of just politically correctly talk alot about it and, hence, we DON'T murder children, and there's nothing to talk about because we're honest about it and it is taken for granted in our society that these values  -- and the lives of our progeny -- automatically come first and before our own needs."

Abortion is only a big issue because so many baby-killers know it's immoral and wrong and don't want to get caught.  What will happen if partial birth abortions become illegal?  What will happen should the U.S. Supreme Court finally take their heads out of the holes on which they sit and BAN ALL ABORTION?  What will these womens' rights protestors and the democrats be forced to do, past all their four-year-old-like crying and screaming (which will be loud indeed: hear us now and believe us later)?

OH-MY-GOSH!!!  They'll actually have to take responsibility for their actions and their "care for the children" rhetoric!

POINT  --  The Way says that this would be one of the best things that could possibly happen to America and the World, in the 21st century or ever.  The abolition of this barbaric immorality will result in our grandchildren actually growing up knowing better and truly valuing life, for talk is cheap and today's whacko  protestors and democrat politicians will, by then, happily be long since dead and gone, thank God  By then, the value of the family will, once again, take it's properly important place in our society, instead of just being another politically correct something about which we talk.  Imagine that!  Kids will, for example, grow up with fathers and, hence, have no need for gangs, and - voilà - crime goes down.  This is just a single example of why family values are so important.  (This concept, sadly, is lost on the selfish.)

Taking responsibility: What a novel idea.  Really Valuing life: An even better one, whose time is nowPOINT  --  The Way votes YES!!!

P.S.:   We can only hope that similar protection is immediately passed for all unborn children (read: fetuses).  We either value life, or we don'tWhich is it?


2:30:28 AM          Google It!


Wednesday, 04 June, 2003
 

hillary is exposing herself, something at which the clintons are experts.  She is now trying to get us to feel sorry for her (read: marketing scam) so that we buy her new book about her "intolerable" life in the White House with former "president," adulterer, rapist and admitted & convicted criminal, bilious clinton.  Typical democrat, always trying to get richer off the people, allthewhile claiming "poor little me."  POINT  --  The Way will bet anyone a buck that she doesn't give the proceeds of the book to the poor, to any program that helps the needy or to any other cause about which she claims to care.

(Note here that democrats will always be happy to steal your money and give it away to lots of people who don't deserve it but who will vote for the democraps, but they will never give any of their own money to their concerns.  Yet the whacko liberal leftist neo-communist protestors always rant against the Republicans, who are always the ones producing economic growth and jobs.  OH!  Sorry - we forgot that the neo-coms are still having trouble with "2+2=4".)

hillary will keep all of her million$ to herself as she claims how much she cares about America's disadvantaged (like she cares about the children).  Keep in mind that she cared so much about immoral behavior when she was the "first bitch" that she decided NOT to divorce her "husband," choosing, instead, to claim she was actually from New York so she could use her prestige as the little white house doggy and run for Senator.  Sadly, the idiots in New York fell for her bullshit, and they (and the citizens of California, for that matter) are now reaping the "rewards" of letting the democraps have control over their wallets.

The bitch is now whining that when "billy jack" clinton told her the truth about Monica sucking his pud under the oval office desk, "I felt like I couldn't breathe."

POINT  --  The Way says, "Like we really care!  PLEASE, hillary, do us all a favor - go ahead, STOP BEATHING!"


11:59:35 PM          Google It!


Sunday, 01 June, 2003
 

Further FYI, POINT  --  The Way now has comments.  There are still a few adjustments to be made, but these shouldn't affect your ability to respond to our posts, so have at it.  Please note that you have the right to freely speak, but NOT the right to be heard.  Inscribe civilly.  Your right, endowed by us, to freely speak on our site may be revoked at any time; abusers and flamers, count on it!  International visitors, feel lucky; the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights afford you nothing.


3:49:41 AM          Google It!



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 - POINT -- The Way.
Last update: 05-Sep-03; 3:46:36 AM.