|
|
Wednesday, January 05, 2005 |
|
A bit of a detour but a a fascinating essay, showing the depth of US participation that can bordre on, if not support corruption, sponsored by the army says (note the way the word corruption slips in.)
Posted by douglass carmichael 5:12:27 PM |
|
The NYT in an editorial
This is an amzing exoneration of the rest of us, and corporations, from the details of the economy of the area, the development of Exxon's natural gas fields in Aech, and all the use of military power to move people off land, extort them and kill. The presence of so many people on hte edge may be linked to major land clearing and other economic factors that are exploitative.
the divergence with the image of the culprit mother nature is vast. That people live where they do, fish as they do, are realted to world resource and population problems, not to mere acts of nature. The emerging question in the Indian Ocean tsunami aftereffects is whether the awareness of the conditions of real lives, so many, so fragile, will have any impact on the direction the leadership, the press, and economics will take. Governance and the media live ion a self serving narrow partial illusion. Can we expect this to get better? What can we do? That is, is there an emerging alternative that has a chance of creating a coherent society we, humanity, could actually step into, out of our current ways, without capsizing in the attempt? To put it in yet another perspective, The total deaths are less than the monthly birthrate for india alone, at 23/1000/year, and the annual death rate for children and malaria I think is about 5 million. The visual TVable power of the Tsunami is probabaly what makes this so powerful as a representative event of our time. It can be compared to
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/users/login.php?story_id=2497&URL=http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2497
For a report on Exxon in Aech see http://www.laborrights.org/projects/corporate/exxon/
Posted by douglass carmichael 4:29:07 PM | |||||||