<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Sat, 26 Jul 2003 04:34:16 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Marcus Kwan&apos;s Radio Weblog</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0127222/</link>
		<description></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2003 Marcus Kwan</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2003 04:34:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>mkwan@austin.rr.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>mkwan@austin.rr.com</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Wow the MT with enhanced SocialDynamX seems to be generating controversy</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0127222/2003/07/25.html#a2</link>
			<description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://kalsey.com/2003/07/zempt_competitor/&quot;&gt;Adam Kalsey:&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;They?re also ripping off the &lt;SPAN class=caps&gt;MT&lt;/SPAN&gt; design. I suppose if you are doing a tool for Movalbe Type it makes sense to make the design familiar, but a straight copy seems like a bad idea. And what if &lt;SPAN class=caps&gt;MT&lt;/SPAN&gt; changes the design?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;OL dir=ltr&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;MT users seem to be passionate about MT, so isn&apos;t it natural to give a client app that looks like MT rather than using a Microsoft COM control UI?&amp;nbsp;Doesn&apos;t seem like you have control at all of what the UI looks like.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;So did SDX &quot;rip off&quot; Radio brand, no, FM Radio is Radio branded. It&apos;s for Radio Users. MT with enhanced SocialDynamX is the same idea. It&apos;s for MT users who are used to the MT web UI. Did you rip off the Redmond gray design?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;If MT changes the UI, so what, SDX can create an updated skin, or better yet, a cadre of skins for user preference.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style=&quot;MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;You can?t edit previous posts with &lt;SPAN class=caps&gt;FM &lt;/SPAN&gt;Radio, so I?d imagine that you won?t be able to do that with the &lt;SPAN class=caps&gt;MT&lt;/SPAN&gt; version either.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;Dude, wrong again, you can edit previous posts in FM Radio.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Their screenshot shows a very Radio-centric blogging tool with a specific link field, title, no extended entries, categories, or comment settings.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;It&apos;s a first gen product, more to come.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;So am I concerned? Not in the least.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;Yeah, sit back and relax. :)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title=Eclecticism href=&quot;http://djwudi.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;Eclecticism&lt;/A&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;First impression? Ugh, that&apos;s horrid.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Now, I&apos;m a little unclear from looking at their site as to whether that&apos;s a replacment for the default MT interface that you see in your web browser (as is implied by the term &quot;skin&quot;), or whether it&apos;s a seperate standalone program for posting to MT (such as &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A title=Kung-Log href=&quot;http://www.kung-foo.tv/kunglog.php&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT color=#003366&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Kung-Log&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;, &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A title=&quot;Among Other Things&quot; href=&quot;http://www.interalia.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT color=#003366&gt;&lt;EM&gt;UserSpace&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt; or &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A title=Zempt href=&quot;http://www.zempt.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT color=#003366&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Zempt&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;). If it&apos;s a standalone program, then okay, it&apos;s most likely Windows-based, and the horrid ugly interface makes sense. But if it&apos;s a &quot;skin&quot; designed to replace the standard MT interface within the browser &amp;#151; why is it so verschluggene ugly?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2003/07/25.html#a3926&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT color=#cccc66&gt;[scoblizer]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.socialdynamx.net/pictures/viewer$111&quot;&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0045ad&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Social Dynamix is doing a custom skin for Moveable Type&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;. I&apos;m playing with their FM Radio product for Radio UserLand. It&apos;s awesome.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2003/07/25.html#a3926&quot;&gt;&lt;FONT color=#cccc66&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0127222/2003/07/25.html#a2</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2003 04:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=127222&amp;amp;p=2&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0127222%2F2003%2F07%2F25.html%23a2</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0127222/2003/07/05.html#a1</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;test blog&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0127222/2003/07/05.html#a1</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2003 22:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=127222&amp;amp;p=1&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0127222%2F2003%2F07%2F05.html%23a1</comments>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
