A close up of a school experience
Vis-à-vis Kentucky adoptions
Linda Ellis
[my comments in brackets. Ms. Ellis described the process publishers went through to comply with Kentucky requirements for electronic format of texts through the bidding process. It is evident by her description that DOE and Procurement officials as well as the attorneys working for the AG’s office did not use the same language when discussion the issue reflecting a lack of knowledge of the publishing process, a lack of knowledge of technology, and a misunderstanding of what the electronically formatted material was required to support.]
Hopefully, Ky is a worse case scenario.
- School Market
- State determines books used
- You sell to the district
- In 2003 Ky was set to decide titles on practical living and vocational studies materials
- This is the bill that created the problem
- KY requires formats for use by students requiring reading accommodations
- Bid sheet says DOE must receive copy of alternative format
- 3 levels of compliance
- XML with Alt tags
- MS word or Rich text
- PDF (marginal compliance)
- Thomson first question was low resolution vs high resolution
- SW began ordering PDF files at low resolution
- Second question – can we use locked PDF’s?
- First answer was may meant permissible
- So they sent locked files
- Ky changed mind – must be unlocked
- Operating system issue
- Found out if original done on a PC – you had to save to a MAC to make work
- Not all Ky schools were using Adobe readers
- Some PDF files weren’t opening
- Version of adobe was at issue
- But AG, interpreted “to the extent feasible” meant alternative format was optional
[publishers think pre-emption is only means to assure infringement not a problem. They want to prevent the crime, not punish the crime.]
So, Ky reopened bidding and provided general guidelines
Copyright 2004 Jim Flowers
Theme Design by Bryan Bell