<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:09:34 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>ConnectedToSource.net</title>		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0141416/</link>		<description>Looking at the world through &quot;Open&quot; eyes!</description>		<copyright>Copyright 2004 Aldo Castaneda</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:09:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>		<managingEditor>aldo@theWorld.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>aldo@theWorld.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>1</hour>			<hour>2</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>10</hour>			<hour>12</hour>			<hour>17</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			</skipHours>		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>   </title>			<description>The large centralized for profit corporation is in many ways a creatureof the industrial revolution. At the turn of the century centralized management and decentralizedcapital investment made sense, because productivity gains required large financial investments. The pooling of financialresources provided the large investment capital required and acentralized professional management class marshalled those financialresources for maximum profit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While two tier structure of investors and managers has proved efficient(the modern corporate form employs more people than any other businessorganization),this structure also creates tensions and conflicts of interest thatrequire extensive legal oversight and therefore inefficiency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now consider the success of Linux and Mozilla Firefox, to name just twoexamples of successful Open Source projects. Both are examples ofself-organizing, value creating &quot;communities&quot; that required neithercentralized professional management nor large far flung financialcapital investments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given the possibility of creating desirable products (can we leave itto &quot;intangibles&quot; such as software and creative works for now?) viacollaborativeefforts such as Linux and the Mozilla Project, can we envision economicmodels that permit these &quot;productive collaborators&quot; to reap theeconomic benefits of what they produce while at the same time allowingthe underlying functionality (in the software context), ideas (creativeworks - music, text, audio and video) to be shared and re-used morefreely (I&apos;m not advocating the end of property).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is the question that this site is dedicated to exploring. Todaythe main, retort to this question is &quot;Services&quot;. By that I understandthat if you give the software away you can provide support to it for afee. Or if you give the music away, you sell tickets to a show later.While I don&apos;t dispute the value of those revenue streams it seems to methere&apos;s more to it than just that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus this site. Please join me in this exploration!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0141416/2004/12/21.html#a43</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:36:14 GMT</pubDate>			<enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/connectedtosource/AudioFeeds/CTS-2004-12-24.mp3" length="6169403" type="audio/mpeg"/>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=141416&amp;amp;p=43&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0141416%2F2004%2F12%2F21.html%23a43</comments>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>