|
 |
Thursday, February 03, 2005 |
In an attempt to evolve a system spec for designing a system that helps
journalists maintain transparency without so much burden that it
intereferes with their jobs, I'm starting the JOTS specification.
JOTS stands for Journalist's Online Transparency System and, based on
my experiences in trying to manually build my own transparency channel,
I will be proposing JOTS features whose main objective is to achieve
maximum transparency with the least amount of effort. I've
established a separate category called JOTS Specification for those of
you who just want to browse the various spec items, and offer ideas.
9:11:48 PM
RadioEdit
|
|
Objective: Establish a database
of sources and their transparency preferences as a pre-processor for
raw materials coming from that source
Abstract: The system should include a database of contacts and a tickler
that helps the journalist to understand whether or not a source has
been notified of the journalist's transparency policy and how that
source has responded. For example, the source may provide blanket
approval to publish all notes or may say "Ask First." A
more advanced feature could include a way to provide redactable text
strings. For example, a boolean (true/false) field that goes with
a source's e-mail address to that indicates whether the source is ok
with having their e-mail address published or not. Let's say the
answer is no. The "Redact Email Address" field would be set to
true, and the next time I forward an e-mail into the system from that
sender, the system automatically redacts all occurences of the e-mail
address from the text (but still gives me the opportunity to review
it).
9:07:01 PM
RadioEdit
|
|
Objective: With e-mail being
one of the ways a lot of raw data is captured, there needs to be a fast
and easy way to move raw material from an e-mail inbox into JOTS
(Journalist's Online Transparency Systems) without the journalist
having to do too much to make sure the raw material gets handled
properly.
Abstract: I've had to cut and paste e-mails in a way that formatting is
very screwy and I have to and fix it. Also, redacting senstivie
data is cumbersome and could use automation. When I receive an
email, I should be able to forward it to a system and tag it with, at
the very least, the sender's name and a title for the editorial project
that the story is associated with. The system should respond via
e-mail with a URL for editing the entry which I can click on an review
before publishing into the transparency channel. The system could
for example provide me with a way to look for specific text to redact
and then do a search and replace on that that text (instead of me
having to do it by hand)
9:04:44 PM
RadioEdit
|
|
© Copyright 2005 David Berlind.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| February 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan Mar |
BlogRolls
|
Top 10 hits for media transparency on..
1. | |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. | |
7. | |
8. | |
9. | |
10. | |
 | 3/23/2005; 11:21:16 PM. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Categories and Current Editorial Projects*
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|